Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31851400›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2020

Mechanochemical Adhesion and Plasticity in Multifiber Hydrogel Networks.

Matthew D Davidson, Ehsan Ban, Anna C M Schoonen, Mu-Huan Lee, Matteo D'Este, Vivek B Shenoy, Jason A Burdick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Listen to Your Gut: Key Concepts for Bioengineering Advanced Models of the Intestine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Review on Bioinks and their Application in Plant Bioprinting.International journal of bioprinting · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew D DavidsonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Ehsan BanCenter for Engineering Mechanobiology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Anna C M SchoonenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Mu-Huan LeeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Matteo D'EsteAO Research Institute Davos, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Vivek B ShenoyCenter for Engineering Mechanobiology and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jason A BurdickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-332X
University of Pennsylvania · USAO Foundation · CH

Funding

Dynamic Fibrous Scaffolds for Repairing Dense Connective TissuesR01AR056624 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason A Burdick, Robert L Mauck · 2009 to 2026
$7.5M
Tunable Synthetic ECMs for Investigating Stellate Cell Activation and MigrationF32DK117568 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIDSON, MATTHEW DAVID · 2018 to 2021
$223k
Center for Engineering MechanoBiology STC 15-48571National Science Foundation DMR-1720530National Science Foundation NNCI-1542153NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056624NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK117568NIH HHS F32 DK117568NIH HHS R01 AR056624Swiss National Science Foundation IZSEZ0_177045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) has force-responsive (i.e., mechanochemical) properties that enable adaptation to mechanical loading through changes in fibrous network structure and interfiber bonding. Imparting such properties into synthetic fibrous materials will allow reinforcement under mechanical load, the potential for material self-adhesion, and the general mimicking of ECM. Multifiber hydrogel networks are developed through the electrospinning of multiple fibrous hydrogel populations, where fibers contain complementary chemical moieties (e.g., aldehyde and hydrazide groups) that form covalent bonds within minutes when brought into contact under mechanical load. These fiber interactions lead to microscale anisotropy, as well as increased material stiffness and plastic deformation. Macroscale structures (e.g., tubes and layered scaffolds) are fabricated from these materials through interfiber bonding and adhesion when placed into contact while maintaining a microscale fibrous architecture. The design principles for engineering plasticity described can be applied to numerous material systems to introduce unique properties, from textiles to biomedical applications.

Indexed as

AdhesivesElastic ModulusExtracellular MatrixHumansHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsMesenchymal Stem CellsOligopeptidesAdhesivesarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsOligopeptidesbiomimetic materialselectrospinningmechanochemical systemsresponsive materialsself-adhesive hydrogels

Identifiers

PMID31851400
PMCPMC7042082
OpenAlexW2995583400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.