Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31851388›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020

Advance Care Planning: Social Isolation Matters.

Thomas K M Cudjoe, Cynthia M Boyd, Jennifer L Wolff, David L Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas K M CudjoeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-2590-209X
Cynthia M BoydDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer L WolffCenter on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
David L RothDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Strengthening Informal Support Resources with Strategic Methodological AdvancesP30AG048773 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROTH, DAVID L · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Research and Mentoring ProgramK24AG056578 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Social Connections and Health among Older Adults Living in Low-income HousingR03AG064253 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CUDJOE, THOMAS KOFI MENSAH · 2019 to 2021
$246k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056578NIA NIH HHS P30 AG048773NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial isolation is a risk factor for poor health that influences the well-being older adults.

objectiveWe compare advance care planning (ACP) engagement of older adults who were severely socially isolated, socially isolated, and not socially isolated.

designCross-sectional analysis of the 2012 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS).

settingUnited States of America.

participantsA total of 2015 older adults (aged ≥65 years) randomly selected from a representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries to participate in an ACP module as part of an annual in-person interview. MEASUREMENTS: We classified participants in three groups: severely socially isolated, socially isolated, or not socially isolated. ACP refers to three (yes/no) questions regarding whether a participant had a: (1) prior discussion about care preferences in the case of serious illness (EOL Discussion); (2) durable power of attorney (DPOA); and (3) advance directive (AD). We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the association between social isolation and ACP.

resultsApproximately 23% of older adults were either severely socially isolated or socially isolated. Older adults who experienced social isolation were less likely to engage in ACP than those who were not socially isolated. In adjusted analysis, older adults who were socially isolated had lower odds of having an EOL discussion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-0.87) or having a DPOA (AOR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.53-0.96) compared to those who were not socially isolated.

conclusionSocial isolation is associated with lower engagement in ACP. Clinicians should identify older adults who are at risk for or experience social isolation as they may benefit from targeted ACP efforts. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:841-846, 2020.

Indexed as

Social IsolationAdvance Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleProxySurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal Careadvance care planningadvance directivedurable power of attorneyend-of-life discussionsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID31851388
PMCPMC12266381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.