Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31851351›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiation With Celecoxib vs Concurrent Chemoradiation Alone on Survival Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With and Without Cyclooxygenase 2 Genetic Variants: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nan Bi, Jun Liang, Zongmei Zhou, Dongfu Chen, Zhixue Fu, Xu Yang, QinFu Feng, Zhouguang Hui, Zefen Xiao, Jima Lv and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01503385 (A Randomized Phase II Trial of Cisplatin/Etoposide and Concurrent Radiotherapy With or Without Celecoxib in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01503385 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Cisplatin/Etoposide and Concurrent Radiotherapy With or Without Celecoxib in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2011 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsLung CancerArmsCelecoxib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Celecoxib in oncology: targeting the COX-2/PGEFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. COX-2 in lung cancer: Mechanisms, development, and targeted therapies.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The role of lipid metabolism in cancer radioresistance.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nan BiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jun LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zongmei ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dongfu ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhixue FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xu YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
QinFu FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhouguang HuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zefen XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jima LvDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaozhen WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lei DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenqing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jingbo WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lipin LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chen HuDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Luhua WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJohns Hopkins University · USPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging. The rationale of combining a cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitor with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) was based on results of preclinical research and prospective clinical studies; however, no randomized clinical trial has provided evidence of a direct comparison with CCRT alone. Objective: To determine the effect of combined selective COX-2 inhibition with standard CCRT on survival among patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center, open-label, randomized phase 2 clinical trial was performed among 96 patients who had histologically and cytologically confirmed unresectable stage III NSCLC. Participants were enrolled from November 2011 to August 2015. Data were analyzed from February to October 2018. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive thoracic radiation, 60 Gy, for 6 weeks concurrent with etoposide and cisplatin or the same regimen of CCRT combined with 200 mg of celecoxib, taken twice daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points were the proportion of patients with treatment-related toxic effects, progression-free survival, and overall survival in subgroups with and without the COX-2 genotype. Results: A total of 100 patients were randomized. Following the exclusion of 4 outliers, 96 participants (96.0%) were analyzed (51 randomized to CCRT alone and 45 randomized to CCRT with celecoxib; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [8.3] years; 73.0 [76.0%] male). The median overall survival time was 32.8 (95% CI, 17.0-48.5) months in the group that received CCRT with celecoxib and 35.5 (95% CI, 25.8-45.2) months in the group that received CCRT alone (P = .88). Celecoxib with CCRT was well tolerated; the incidence of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was 6.6% (95% CI, 1.4%-18.0%) in the group that received CCRT with celecoxib and 11.8% (95% CI, 4.4%-23.9%) in the group that received CCRT alone (P = .49). Among patients with the high-risk genotype, celecoxib plus CCRT was not associated with higher progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.13-1.04; P = .05) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.15-1.72; P = .26) compared with CCRT alone. Conclusions and Relevance: In unresectable stage III NSCLC, adding celecoxib to concurrent chemoradiation did not improve survival. A smaller, not statistically significant proportion of patients in the CCRT with celecoxib group compared with the CCRT alone group developed symptomatic radiation pneumonitis. Among patients with the high-risk genotype, adding celecoxib to CCRT did not improve overall or progression-free survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01503385.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCelecoxibChemoradiotherapyCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase InhibitorsDisease ProgressionDose Fractionation, RadiationDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedCelecoxibCisplatinCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31851351
PMCPMC6991217
OpenAlexW2995114959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.