Trial reportJAMA surgery2020
Association of Prehospital Plasma Transfusion With Survival in Trauma Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock When Transport Times Are Longer Than 20 Minutes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the PAMPer and COMBAT Clinical Trials.
Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 127 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) Phase III Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Interventional Trial A Four Year Multicenter Open Label Randomized Trial
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Fresh Frozen Plasma Versus Standard Crystalloid Intravenous Fluid as Initial Resuscitation Fluid
Who cites it
127 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Metabolomics after trauma in experimental models- a systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Optimizing Fluid Resuscitation Strategies: A Network Meta-analysis of Effectiveness and Safety for Hemorrhagic Shock Patients in Emergency Settings.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Prehospital coagulation management and fluid replacement therapy in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries - A systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Trauma and Intensive Care (ERATIC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and International Association for Trauma Surgery and Intensive Care (IATSIC) Society Recommendations: Paper 2: Postoperative and Intensive Care Recommendations.World journal of surgery · 2025Guideline
- Inhospital coagulation management and fluid replacement therapy in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries - a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of pre-hospital plasma in patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Pooled it
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply and use of blood for transfusion.The Lancet. Haematology · 2020Pooled it
- Next generation spray-dried on-demand plasma: A multicenter, randomized, dose-escalation, first-in-human safety study.Transfusion · 2026Trial
- Prehospital Resuscitation with Type O Whole Blood for Trauma and Hemorrhage.The New England journal of medicine · 2026Trial
- Pre-hospital freeze-dried plasma for critical bleeding after trauma: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Resuscitation with blood products in patients with trauma-related haemorrhagic shock receiving prehospital care (RePHILL): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.The Lancet. Haematology · 2022Trial
- Characterization of unexpected survivors following a prehospital plasma randomized trial.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2020Trial
- Association of Prehospital Plasma With Survival in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the PAMPer Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Forgot calcium? Admission ionized-calcium in two civilian randomized controlled trials of prehospital plasma for traumatic hemorrhagic shock.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2020Trial
- Blood supply continuity and emergency preparedness in natural and man-made disasters and in armed conflicts-The Nordic perspectives.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Advancing Microcirculatory Therapies in Pediatric Sepsis: Current Opportunities and Future Directions.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Administration of 25% albumin improves prehospital survivability in a preclinical rat model of decompensated hemorrhagic shock.Transfusion · 2026Article
- Plasma transfusion in neonatal sepsis.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Both military and civilian clinical practice guidelines include early plasma transfusion to achieve a plasma to red cell ratio approaching 1:1 to 1:2. However, it was not known how early plasma should be given for optimal benefit. Two recent randomized clinical trials were published, with apparently contradictory results. The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) clinical trial showed a nearly 30% reduction in mortality with plasma transfusion in the prehospital environment, while the Control of Major Bleeding After Trauma (COMBAT) clinical trial showed no survival improvement. Objective: To facilitate a post hoc combined analysis of the COMBAT and PAMPer trials to examine questions that could not be answered by either clinical trial alone. We hypothesized that prehospital transport time influenced the effects of prehospital plasma on 28-day mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 626 patients in the 2 clinical trials were included. Patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or 2 U of thawed plasma followed by standard care in the prehospital environment. Data analysis was performed between September 2018 and January 2019. Interventions: Prehospital transfusion of 2 U of plasma compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In this post hoc analysis of 626 patients (467 men [74.6%] and 159 women [25.4%]; median [interquartile range] age, 42 [27-57] years) who had trauma with hemorrhagic shock, a Cox regression analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit for plasma (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90; P = .01) after adjustment for injury severity, age, and clinical trial cohort (COMBAT or PAMPer). A significant association with prehospital transport time was detected (from arrival on scene to arrival at the trauma center). Increased mortality was observed in patients in the standard care group when prehospital transport was longer than 20 minutes (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.30; P = .04), while increased mortality was not observed in patients in the prehospital plasma group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.51; P = .46). No serious adverse events were associated with prehospital plasma transfusion. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that prehospital plasma is associated with a survival benefit when transport times are longer than 20 minutes and that the benefit-risk ratio is favorable for use of prehospital plasma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01838863 (COMBAT) and NCT01818427 (PAMPer).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.