SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2020
Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05870696 (Evaluation of the Serum Metabolite Based PrecogColo Dx Test for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Serum Metabolite Based PrecogColo Dx Test for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Screening
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations.International journal of cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Fecal DNA methylation markers for detecting stages of colorectal cancer and its precursors: a systematic review.Clinical epigenetics · 2020Pooled it
- Performance of Faecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Varying Positivity Thresholds.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Trial
- Feasibility and Compliance of Stool Collection for Future Microbiome-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening: Preliminary Findings from a Prospective Multicenter FIT-Positive Cohort.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic value of fecal and serum carcinoembryonic antigen for colorectal cancer detection.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- A Validation Study of Methylated Syndecan-2 in Stool DNA for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Is Negative Fecal Immunochemical Test Reassuring? The Cumulative Risk of Colorectal Cancer after Multiple Negative Tests.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- A Prospective, Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study Evaluating a Multi-Target Blood Protein in Vitro Diagnostic Test for Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Potential Impact of Updated Bayesian Deduction in Medicine: Application to Colonoscopy Prioritization.Cancers · 2025Article
- Increasing the accessibility to colorectal cancer screening in the community via faecal immunochemical test kits dispensed via automated kiosk.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Review
- Article
- Minimally Invasive Bowel Cancer Detection through Vibrating Microrobot-Induced Elastography.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Non-invasive breath testing to detect colorectal cancer: protocol for a multicentre, case-control development and validation study (COBRA2 study).BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The effect on colorectal cancer incidence and staging with population-based FOBT-screening in Sweden.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Detection of colorectal-cancer-associated bacterial taxa in fecal samples using next-generation sequencing and 19 newly established qPCR assays.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Development of Electronic Nose as a Complementary Screening Tool for Breath Testing in Colorectal Cancer.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Colon lesions in elderly individuals with positive and negative fecal immunochemical test results among PERSIAN Guilan cohort study (PGCS) population.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but evidence for variation in sensitivity according to the CRC stage is sparse and has not yet been systematically synthesized. Thus, our objective was to systematically review and summarize evidence on the stage-specific sensitivity of FITs.
methodsWe screened PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 14, 2019, for English-language articles reporting on the stage-specific sensitivity of FIT for CRC detection using colonoscopy as a reference standard. Studies reporting stage-specific sensitivities and the specificity of FIT for CRC detection were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity according to the CRC stage and study setting (screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies) were derived from bivariate meta-analysis.
resultsForty-four studies (92,447 participants including 3,034 CRC cases) were included. Pooled stage-specific sensitivities were overall very similar but suffered from high levels of imprecision because of small case numbers when calculated separately for screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies. Pooled sensitivities (95% confidence intervals) for all studies combined were 73% (65%-79%) for stage-I-CRCs and 80% (74%-84%), 82% (77%-87%), and 79% (70%-86%) for the detection of CRC stages II, III, and IV, respectively. Even substantially larger variation was seen in sensitivity by T-stage, with summary estimates ranging from 40% (21%-64%) for T1 to 83% (68%-91%) for T3-CRC. DISCUSSION: Although FITs detect 4 of 5 CRCs at stages II-IV, the substantially lower sensitivity for stage-I-CRC and, in particular, T1 CRC indicates both need and potential for further improvement in performance for the early detection of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.