Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31850918›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2020

Association of Diabetes and Other Clinical and Sociodemographic Factors With Guideline-concordant Breast Cancer Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Heather T Gold, Huibo Shao, Ruth Oratz, Onchee Yu, Marilyn Hammer, Stephen Richardson, Denise Boudreau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heather T GoldNYU Langone Health.
Huibo ShaoIndependent Consultant, Germantown, TN.
Ruth OratzNYU Langone Health.
Onchee YuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Marilyn HammerDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Stephen RichardsonNYU Langone Health.
Denise BoudreauKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Hinge Health · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Commonly Used Medications and Breast Cancer RecurrenceR01CA120562 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI BOUDREAU, DENISE M · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Treatment and Outcomes in Diabetic Breast Cancer PatientsR01CA188353 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GOLD, HEATHER TAFFET · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120562NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with breast cancer have worse health outcomes with co-occurring type 2 diabetes, possibly due to suboptimal breast cancer treatment.

methodsWe created a cohort of women ages 66 to 85 y with stage I to III breast cancer from 1993 to 2012 from an integrated health care delivery system (n=1612) and fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (n=98,915), linked to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data (total n=100,527). We evaluated associations between type 2 diabetes and other factors with undergoing guideline-concordant cancer treatment. We estimated χ tests for univariate analysis and relative risks (RRs) using multivariable log-binomial models for outcomes of (1) overall guideline-concordant treatment, (2) definitive surgical therapy (mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation), (3) chemotherapy if indicated, and (4) endocrine therapy.

resultsOur cohort included 60% of subjects with stage 1 tumors, one quarter below 70 years old, 23% had diabetes, 35% underwent overall guideline-concordant treatment, 24% chemotherapy, and 83% endocrine therapy. Women with diabetes were less likely to undergo overall guideline-concordant treatment (RR: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-0.98), and only slightly less likely to undergo guideline-concordant definitive surgical therapy (RR: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00). No differences were found for chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. Other factors significantly associated with a lower risk of guideline-concordant care were cancer stages II to III (vs. I; RR=0.47-0.69, P<0.0001), older age (vs. 66 to 69 y; RR=0.56-0.90, P<0.0001), higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid dual-eligibility.

conclusionsDiabetes was associated with lower adherence to overall guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment. However, higher stage, older age, higher comorbidity burden, and Medicaid insurance were more strongly associated with lower use of guideline-concordant treatment. Given the heavy burden of breast cancer and diabetes, long-term outcomes analysis should consider guideline-concordant treatment. IMPACT: Other factors besides diabetes are more strongly associated with guideline-concordant breast cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMedicaidMedicareMultivariate AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID31850918
PMCPMC7087365
OpenAlexW2996175006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.