ArticleClinical laboratory2019
Evaluation of the Newly Developed Adenosine Diphosphate-Induced Platelet Aggregation Level System in Aggregometer on Automated Coagulation Analyzer.
Article in Clinical laboratory, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative study of four platelet function tests conducted using two systems in neuroendovascular patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an automated platelet aggregation method for detection of congenital or acquired platelet function defects.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLight transmission aggregometry (LTA) is the gold standard for platelet function assessment. The automated coagulation analyzer from Sysmex that performs LTA offers the advantage of being a walk-away technology. Recently, a new parameter "ADP-induced platelet aggregation level (APAL)" was developed to support the interpretation of results. APAL is calculated as a score from 0.0 to 10.0 based on platelet aggregation patterns with 1 and 10 µM adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Here, the basic performance of the newly developed APAL system and comparison with the maximum aggregation rate of ADP (ADP-MA) was evaluated.
methodsThe within-run precision was calculated by conducting five replicate analyses of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from healthy volunteers and 0.05 µM of cangrelor-spiked PRP. Cangrelor is a P2Y12 inhibitor that does not require liver CYP activation. The reference interval was calculated from the results of 67 healthy volunteers. The effect of the antiplatelet P2Y12 agent was evaluated using several concentrations of cangrelor. A comparative study was performed using 103 PRP samples with different levels of aggregation. Each test was analyzed with both APAL and ADP-MA.
resultsThe percentage coefficient of variation in within-run precision was within 7% for APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA. Reference interval of APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA was 7.1 - 10.0 and 80.0 - 99.2%, respectively. APAL signifi-cantly decreased with the addition of 0.02 µM cangrelor, while 10 µM ADP-MA was barely affected. A significant correlation was observed between APAL and 10 µM ADP-MA (r = 0.94; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe newly developed APAL system exhibited an acceptable performance. APAL score showed a good correlation with ADP-MA and was adequate to detect the weak effect of P2Y12 inhibitors. APAL is a new platelet aggregation scoring system with the potential to monitor the effects of P2Y12 inhibitor over a wide range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.