ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020
Dual-V
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fully self-gated dual-venc five-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging for simultaneous imaging of the cardiovascular and portal venous systems: A feasibility study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026Article
- 4D-Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An 8-Year Clinical Practice Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding in patients with complex congenital heart disease: a feasibility study.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Oscillatory shear stress is elevated in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic regurgitation: a 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance cross-sectional study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing vascular imaging: trends and future directions of 4D flow MRI based on a 20-year bibliometric analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- 4Dflow-VP-Net: A deep convolutional neural network for noninvasive estimation of relative pressures in stenotic flows from 4D flow MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2023Article
- Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI with variable high-venc spatial resolution for neurovascular applications.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Relative pressure estimation from 4D flow MRI using generalized Bernoulli equation in a phantom model of arterial stenosis.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Rationale and clinical applications of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in assessment of valvular heart disease: a comprehensive review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022Review
- Enhanced 4D Flow MRI-Based CFD with Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Flow Dynamics Assessment in Coarctation of the Aorta.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Patient-Specific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Biomechanics: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Integrated Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- 4D flow MRI applications in congenital heart disease.European radiology · 2021Review
- Deep Learning Framework for Real-Time Estimation ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle V PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To design and develop a 4D Spiral Dual V STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: The studied populations were two phantoms-a straight pipe with a stenotic narrowing and a phantom of the aortic arch which included a calcific polymeric valve-under both steady and pulsatile flows, six healthy volunteers, and eight patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, Dual V ASSESSMENT: Data from the proposed sequence were compared with data from 4D Cartesian Dual V STATISTICAL TESTS: Steady flows were compared using relative-root-mean-squared-error (RRMSE). For in vivo flows and pulsatile in vitro flows, net flow for corresponding timepoints were compared with the Pearson correlation test (P < 0.01).
resultsFor steady flows, RRMSEs for Single V DATA
conclusionThe Dual V LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:117-128.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.