Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31850398›Full record

ArticleGates open research2019

An open toolkit for tracking open science partnership implementation and impact.

E Richard Gold, Sarah E Ali-Khan, Liz Allen, Lluis Ballell, Manoel Barral-Netto, David Carr, Damien Chalaud, Simon Chaplin, Matthew S Clancy, Patricia Clarke and 30 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

E Richard GoldCentre for Intellectual Property and Policy (CIPP), Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1W9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-9238
Sarah E Ali-KhanCentre for Intellectual Property and Policy (CIPP), Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1W9, Canada.
Liz AllenF1000, London, W1T 4LB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-3168
Lluis BallellDiseases of the Developing World, Global Health R&D, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3029-1860
Manoel Barral-NettoFundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5823-7903
David CarrWellcome Trust, London, NW1 2BE, UK.
Damien ChalaudMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Simon ChaplinWellcome Trust, London, NW1 2BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-6480
Matthew S ClancyUS Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, 20024, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-1038
Patricia ClarkeHealth Research Board, Dublin, D02 H638, Ireland.
Robert Cook-DeeganArizona State University, Washington, DC, 20006, USA.
A P DinsmoreWellcome Trust, London, NW1 2BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3314-7944
Megan DoerrSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Lisa FedererUS National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
Steven A HillResearch England, UK Research and Innovation, Bristol, BS34 8SR, UK.
Neil JacobsJisc, Bristol, BS2 0JA, UK.
Antoine JeanCentre for Intellectual Property and Policy (CIPP), Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1W9, Canada.
Osmat Azzam JeffersonQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Chonnettia JonesWellcome Trust, London, NW1 2BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3430-8110
Linda J KahlThe Lens, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Thomas M KariukiAfrican Academy of Sciences, Karen, Nairobi, 00502, Kenya.
Sophie N KasselCentre for Intellectual Property and Policy (CIPP), Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1W9, Canada.
Robert KileyWellcome Trust, London, NW1 2BE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4733-2558
Elizabeth Robboy KittrieUS National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.
Bianca KramerUtrecht University Library, Utrecht, CX, 3584, The Netherlands.
Wen Hwa LeeStructural Genomics Consortium (SGC), University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Emily MacDonaldCentre for Intellectual Property and Policy (CIPP), Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1W9, Canada.
Lara M MangraviteSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Elizabeth MarincolaAfrican Academy of Sciences, Karen, Nairobi, 00502, Kenya.
Daniel MietchenData Science Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-1870
Jennifer C MolloyUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Mark NamchukAlkermes, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Brian A NosekDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904-4400, USA.
Sébastien PaquetElement AI, Montreal, QC, H2W 2R2, Canada.
Claude PirmezFundação Oswaldo Cruz - Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21040-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-0455
Annabel SeyllerMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-3125
Malcolm SkingleGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, Herts, SG1 2NY, UK.
S Nicole SpadottoCentre for Intellectual Property and Policy (CIPP), Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3A 1W9, Canada.
Sophie StaniszewskaWarwick Research in Nursing, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-9074
Mike ThelwallUniversity of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serious concerns about the way research is organized collectively are increasingly being raised. They include the escalating costs of research and lower research productivity, low public trust in researchers to report the truth, lack of diversity, poor community engagement, ethical concerns over research practices, and irreproducibility. Open science (OS) collaborations comprise of a set of practices including open access publication, open data sharing and the absence of restrictive intellectual property rights with which institutions, firms, governments and communities are experimenting in order to overcome these concerns. We gathered two groups of international representatives from a large variety of stakeholders to construct a toolkit to guide and facilitate data collection about OS and non-OS collaborations. Ultimately, the toolkit will be used to assess and study the impact of OS collaborations on research and innovation. The toolkit contains the following four elements: 1) an annual report form of quantitative data to be completed by OS partnership administrators; 2) a series of semi-structured interview guides of stakeholders; 3) a survey form of participants in OS collaborations; and 4) a set of other quantitative measures best collected by other organizations, such as research foundations and governmental or intergovernmental agencies. We opened our toolkit to community comment and input. We present the resulting toolkit for use by government and philanthropic grantors, institutions, researchers and community organizations with the aim of measuring the implementation and impact of OS partnership across these organizations. We invite these and other stakeholders to not only measure, but to share the resulting data so that social scientists and policy makers can analyse the data across projects.

Indexed as

impactimplementationindicatorinnovationintellectual propertyOpen sciencepartnershipperformancepolicytoolkit

Identifiers

PMID31850398
PMCPMC6904887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.