Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31850384›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Strategic Priorities for Research on Antibiotic Alternatives in Animal Agriculture-Results From an Expert Workshop.

Timothy Kurt, Nora Wong, Heather Fowler, Cyril Gay, Hyun Lillehoj, Paul Plummer, H Morgan Scott, Karin Hoelzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Swine production: how sustainable is sustainability?Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timothy KurtFoundation for Food and Agriculture Research, Washington, DC, United States.
Nora WongPew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, United States.
Heather FowlerNational Pork Board, Clive, IA, United States.
Cyril GayAgricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Hyun LillehojAgricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Paul PlummerCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
H Morgan ScottDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Karin HoelzerPew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence, spread, and expansion of antibiotic resistance and increasing restrictions on the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture have created a need for efficacious alternatives that remains unmet. Prioritizing research needs in the development of alternatives is key to ensuring that scarce research resources are dedicated to the most promising approaches. However, frameworks to enable a consistent, systematic, and transparent evaluation of antibiotic alternative candidates are lacking. Here, we present such an evaluation framework.

Indexed as

animal agricultureantibiotic alternativesantibiotic resistanceevaluation frameworkresearch prioritization

Identifiers

PMID31850384
PMCPMC6896835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.