ReviewFrontiers in medicine2019
The Innovative Medicines Initiative -10 Years of Public-Private Collaboration.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Landscape of Products for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Scientific and Patent Systematic Review.Recent patents on biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Recommendations for robust and reproducible preclinical research in personalised medicine.BMC medicine · 2023Guideline
- Multimethod quantitative benefit-risk assessment of treatments for moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Rebalancing innovation, affordability, and access for orphan drugs in the European Union.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Global perspectives on central nervous system drug innovation: achievements, barriers, and priorities for the next decade.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- Transformative collaborations in a time of change: Europe's unique model for public-private-philanthropic partnerships.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Review
- The Innovative Health Initiative public-private partnership: a catalyst for big data-driven health research and innovation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Vital lessons from struggling partnerships and potential partnerships: an international study with leaders across the health sector.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Novel and Proven Models of Public, Private, and Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare: An Update.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024Review
- Collaboration for new therapies: maximizing health and innovation.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Involvement of the European Medicines Agency in multi-stakeholder regulatory science research projects: experiences of staff members and project coordinators.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Participating in innovative medicines initiative funded neurodegenerative disorder projects-An impact analysis conducted as part of the NEURONET project.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- The Innovative Medicines Initiative neurodegeneration portfolio: From individual projects to collaborative networks.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Biomarkers in Medicines Development-From Discovery to Regulatory Qualification and Beyond.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Mapping conflict of interests: scoping review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Co-creation of practical "how-to guides" for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development-from theory to implementation.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Crowdsourcing and open innovation in drug discovery: recent contributions and future directions.Drug discovery today · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) is a public-private partnership between the European Union and the European pharmaceutical industry. Born of the necessity to foster collaboration between different stakeholders in order to address growing challenges in bringing new medicines to market and the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape, IMI has successfully delivered the radical collaboration needed to address these challenges. In this article we reflect on some of the major achievements of the programme by highlighting a few of the key projects funded and the progress they have made, as well as some of the lessons learnt in delivering such an ambitious partnership. Those that drove the foundation of IMI recognized that to address these challenges required not just ambitious scientific approaches, but also an awareness of societal needs. Therefore, actors from beyond the traditional pharmaceutical research communities would be needed. One of the key successes of IMI has been to foster radical collaboration between diverse public and private partners of all types, including large pharmaceutical companies, SMEs, regulators, patient organizations and public research institutions. It has achieved this by being a neutral platform where all partners are bound by the same rights and responsibilities. Since it began there has been an evolution in the understanding of what is considered "pre-competitive," resulting in IMI projects now addressing all of the steps within the pharmaceutical development value chain. With this expansion in the types of projects supported by IMI, different actors from beyond the traditional pharmaceutical research family have been attracted to participate, enriching further the collaboration at the heart of the programme. Finally, such a complex programme brings with it challenges, and we reflect on some of the important learnings that should be applied to future collaborative models to ensure that they are as successful as possible and deliver the expected impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.