ArticleTranslational medicine @ UniSa
Current Espghan Guidelines for Celiac Disease in Pediatric Age, Tertiary Care Center Experience: A Proposal for Further Simplification.
Article in Translational medicine @ UniSa. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are children with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) more likely to develop celiac disease? A prospective study.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2023Article
- Sub-acute combined degeneration of the spinal cord as first presentation of coeliac disease in a Sudanese child.Sudanese journal of paediatrics · 2023Article
- Incidence of celiac disease autoimmunity and associations with maternal tuberculosis and pediatricFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Nutritional Composition of Gluten-Free Labelled Foods in the Slovenian Food Supply.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the 2012 ESPGHAN criteria for diagnosis of celiac disease (CD), duodenal biopsy (DB) can be avoided in children with a clear malabsorption syndrome, anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG2) ≥ 10x the cut-off, anti-endomysium IgA (EMA) and HLA DQ2/DQ8 genes. The aim of this study is to report our experience and evaluate the accuracy of the actual guidelines. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective study conducted on all patients diagnosed CD from 2012 to 2018 in our Center. For all patients enrolled were analyzed: data of family history, symptoms, serology, genetics, Marsh grade and follow-up.
resultsA total of 481 children [mean age 6,4 yrs; F:M= 1.8:1] were included in the study. The mean age of patients who were not subject to DB was lower (4.51 yrs) comparing with patients that received DB (6.48 yrs). Out of the 256 patients with anti-tTG2 ≥ 10 fold, 121 underwent DB because of mild symptoms (84/121) or no symptoms (37/121). In all cases Marsh type 3 was found and HLA haplotypes was compatible with CD diagnosis.
conclusionsOur study confirms that the serology has a primary importance to diagnose CD, regardless of the symptoms. These data suggest that biopsy and HLA haplotypes search, in presence of anti-tTG2 IgA ≥ 10x the cut-off, are wasteful and unhelpful for the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31850247PMC6910143W2995380092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.