ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2019
Impact of recipient functional status on 1-year liver transplant outcomes.
Article in World journal of transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Center Differences in PreTransplant Functional Status and Its Association With Survival After Heart Transplantation.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Effect of frailty as measured by functional impairment on long-term outcomes in liver transplantation in the United States.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
- Article
- Body composition and muscle composition phenotypes in patients on waitlist and shortly after liver transplant - results from a pilot study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Recipient functional status impacts on short and long-term intestinal transplant outcomes in United States adults.World journal of transplantation · 2024Article
- Etiology-Specific Effects of Impaired Functional Status on Liver Transplant Outcomes.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- HTLV-1 infection of donor-derived T cells might promote acute graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Associations Between the Liver Frailty Index and Karnofsky Performance Status With Waitlist Mortality.Transplantation direct · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale has been widely validated for clinical practice for over 60 years.
aimTo examine the extent to which poor pre-transplant functional status, assessed using the KPS scale, is associated with increased risk of mortality and/or graft failure at 1-year post-transplantation.
methodsThis study included 38278 United States adults who underwent first, non-urgent, liver-only transplantation from 2005 to 2014 (Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients). Functional impairment/disability was categorized as severe, moderate, or none/normal. Analyses were conducted using multivariable-adjusted Cox survival regression models.
resultsThe median age was 56 years, 31% were women, median pre-transplant Model for End-Stage for Liver Disease score was 18. Functional impairment was present in 70%; one-quarter of the sample was severely disabled. After controlling for key recipient and donor factors, moderately and severely disabled patients had a 1-year mortality rate of 1.32 [confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.44] and 1.73 (95%CI: 1.56-1.91) compared to patients with no impairment, respectively. Subjects with moderate and severe disability also had a multivariable-adjusted 1-year graft failure rate of 1.13 (CI: 1.02-1.24) and 1.16 (CI: 1.02-1.31), respectively.
conclusionPre-transplant functional status is a useful prognostic indicator for 1-year post-transplant patient and graft survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.