ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019
Detection of a Frameshift Deletion in the
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deficiency in homozygous haplotypes reveals recessive lethal variants affecting fertility and viability in the Friesian horse.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Management of genetic defects in breeding programs of species with high prolificacy.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Extreme-Phenotype Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Growth Traits in Spotted Sea Bass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Rare and population-specific functional variation across pig lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Novel bi-allelic variants expand the SPTBN4-related genetic and phenotypic spectrum.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Review: Balancing Selection for Deleterious Alleles in Livestock.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Breeding for resilience: new opportunities in a modern pig breeding program.Journal of animal science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piglet mortality is a complex phenotype that depends on the environment, selection on piglet health, but also on the interaction between the piglet and sow. However, also monogenic recessive defects contribute to piglet mortality. Selective breeding has decreased overall piglet mortality by improving both mothering abilities and piglet viability. However, variants underlying recessive monogenic defects are usually not well captured within the breeding values, potentially drifting to higher frequency as a result of intense selection or genetic drift. This study describes the identification by whole-genome sequencing of a recessive 16-bp deletion in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.