Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31850072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Increased Adaptive Variation Despite Reduced Overall Genetic Diversity in a Rapidly Adapting Invader.

Daniel Selechnik, Mark F Richardson, Richard Shine, Jayna L DeVore, Simon Ducatez, Lee A Rollins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Epigenetics and the success of invasive plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel SelechnikSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences (SOLES), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark F RichardsonDeakin Genomics Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Richard ShineSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences (SOLES), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jayna L DeVoreSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences (SOLES), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Simon DucatezSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences (SOLES), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lee A RollinsEvolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive species often evolve rapidly following introduction despite genetic bottlenecks that may result from small numbers of founders; however, some invasions may not fit this "genetic paradox". The invasive cane toad (

Indexed as

Bufo marinusevolutiongenetic paradox of invasioninvasive speciesRhinella marinaribonucleic acid sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31850072
PMCPMC6901984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.