Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31850019›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Genome-Wide Comparisons of Mutations Induced by Carbon-Ion Beam and Gamma-Rays Irradiation in Rice

Guili Yang, Wenlong Luo, Jian Zhang, Xiancheng Yan, Yan Du, Libin Zhou, Wenjian Li, Hui Wang, Zhiqiang Chen, Tao Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guili YangNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenlong LuoNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ZhangNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiancheng YanNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan DuInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Libin ZhouInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Wenjian LiInstitute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Hui WangNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiqiang ChenNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao GuoNational Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
South China Agricultural University · CNInstitute of Modern Physics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical mutagens, such as carbon-ion beams (CIBs) and gamma rays (GRs), induce mutations with high frequency at a relatively low dose and are more user-friendly and environment-friendly in mutation breeding. Previous studies showed that CIBs induced large sized deletions and insertions, and chromosomal rearrangements, whereas GRs induce shorter deletions and insertions, and more frequent base substitutions. However, the difference on the genomic level between CIB- and GR-induced mutations remains to be clarified. In the present study, we re-sequence six mutagenized lines derived from CIB irradiation and four mutagenized lines derived from GRs. A total of 283 and 381 variations are induced in these mutants by CIBs and GRs, respectively, including single base substitutions (SBSs), small insertion and deletions (InDels), multiple nucleotide variants (MNVs). SBSs are the most abundant type of mutation and single base transition is the main form for SBSs. CIB-induced InDels accounted for 25.44% of the total variations, while GR-induced InDels accounted for 17.85%. On the contrary, the frequency of MNVs induced by GRs was approximately 2.19 times that induced by CIBs, which indicates CIBs induced increased InDels, whereas GRs induced increased MNVs. Notably, multiple base deletions (≥5 bp) were induced at a much higher frequency by CIBs than by GRs. We also find mutations induced by CIBs and GRs are unevenly distributed on chromosomes. Unusual high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) mutation regions are discovered by analyzing mutations per 1Mb along the genome. The mutation frequency within the HF regions were significantly higher than the LF regions (

Indexed as

carbon-ion beams (CIBs) irradiationgamma rays (GRs)InDelsmultiple nucleotide variant (MNV)Oryza sativa L.resequencingsingle base substitution (SBS)structural variant (SV)

Identifiers

PMID31850019
PMCPMC6892775
OpenAlexW2991021898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.