Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31849878›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Endophytes and Epiphytes From the Grapevine Leaf Microbiome as Potential Biocontrol Agents Against Phytopathogens.

Sébastien Bruisson, Mónica Zufferey, Floriane L'Haridon, Eva Trutmann, Abhishek Anand, Agnès Dutartre, Mout De Vrieze, Laure Weisskopf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Oligomycin-producingmSphere · 2024
    Article
  14. Broad-Spectrum Efficacy and Modes of Action of TwoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sébastien BruissonDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Mónica ZuffereyDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Floriane L'HaridonDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Eva TrutmannDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Abhishek AnandDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Agnès DutartreDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Mout De VriezeDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Laure WeisskopfDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
University of Fribourg · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants harbor diverse microbial communities that colonize both below-ground and above-ground organs. Some bacterial members of these rhizosphere and phyllosphere microbial communities have been shown to contribute to plant defenses against pathogens. In this study, we characterize the pathogen-inhibiting potential of 78 bacterial isolates retrieved from endophytic and epiphytic communities living in the leaves of three grapevine cultivars. We selected two economically relevant pathogens, the fungus

Indexed as

BacillusBotrytis cinereaendophytesepiphytesPhytophthora infestansvolatiles

Identifiers

PMID31849878
PMCPMC6895011
OpenAlexW2990257354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.