Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31849766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Effects of Baby Schema and Mere Exposure on Explicit and Implicit Face Processing.

Leonardo Venturoso, Giulio Gabrieli, Anna Truzzi, Atiqah Azhari, Peipei Setoh, Marc H Bornstein, Gianluca Esposito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Updating social evaluation during sleep.NPJ science of learning · 2025
    Article
  3. Lorenz's classic 'baby schema': a useful biological concept?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Reduced Perceived Trustworthiness during Face Mask Wearing.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Leonardo VenturosoDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Giulio GabrieliPsychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Anna TruzziTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Atiqah AzhariPsychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Peipei SetohPsychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Marc H BornsteinInstitute for Fiscal Studies, London, United Kingdom.
Gianluca EspositoDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Nanyang Technological University · SGEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an increasingly multicultural society, the way people perceive individuals from the same vs different ethnic groups greatly affects their own and societal well-being. Two psychological effects that influence these perceptions are the Mere-Exposure Effect (MRE), wherein familiarity with certain objects or persons suffices for people to develop a preference for them, and the Baby Schema (BS), a set of specific facial features that evokes caregiving behaviors and an affective orientation in adults. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether these two effects play a role in implicit physiological responses to babies vs. adults faces belonging to participants in-group vs. out-group. In study 1, the pupillary diameter of 62 Caucasian participants (M = 31; F = 31) who observed adult and infant faces of different ethnic groups (Caucasian, Chinese) was measured. In study 2, brain waves of 38 Caucasian participants (M = 19; F = 19), who observed the same set of faces, were recorded using EEG. In both studies, adults explicit preferences (i.e., attitudes) toward faces were assessed using questionnaires. In Study 1, females showed greater attention to infant than adult faces (BS effect) in both pupils, regardless of the ethnic group of the face. By contrast, males attended to infant more than adult faces for out-group faces only (BS effect). In Study 2, greater left posterior-parietal alpha activation toward out-group compared to in-group adult faces was found in males (MRE). Participants with a low BS effect toward in-group baby faces exhibited greater left posterior alpha activation to out-group than in-group baby faces (MRE). These findings reveal how different levels of sensitivity to in-group infants may moderate perceptions of both in-group and out-group baby faces. Questionnaire measures on attitudes showed that males and females preferred in-group to out-group adult faces (MRE). Participants in Study 2 also reported a greater preference for infants than adults faces (BS effect). These findings explicate the roles of gender and the Baby Schema effect in moderating implicit processing of in-group and out-group faces, despite their lack in moderating explicit reports. Contradictory findings at the implicit (physiological) and explicit (self-report) levels suggest that differential processing of faces may occur at a non-conscious level.

Indexed as

baby schemaEEGface processingmere exposure effectneural oscillationspupillometry

Identifiers

PMID31849766
PMCPMC6895995
OpenAlexW2989875356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.