Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31849632›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroinformatics2019

Decoding Movement From Electrocorticographic Activity: A Review.

Ksenia Volkova, Mikhail A Lebedev, Alexander Kaplan, Alexei Ossadtchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mapping Eye, Arm, and Reward Information in Frontal Motor Cortices Using Electrocorticography in Nonhuman Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. DTCNet: finger flexion decoding with three-dimensional ECoG data.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ksenia VolkovaCenter for Bioelectric Interfaces, Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail A LebedevCenter for Bioelectric Interfaces, Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander KaplanCenter for Bioelectric Interfaces, Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow, Russia.
Alexei OssadtchiCenter for Bioelectric Interfaces, Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocorticography (ECoG) holds promise to provide efficient neuroprosthetic solutions for people suffering from neurological disabilities. This recording technique combines adequate temporal and spatial resolution with the lower risks of medical complications compared to the other invasive methods. ECoG is routinely used in clinical practice for preoperative cortical mapping in epileptic patients. During the last two decades, research utilizing ECoG has considerably grown, including the paradigms where behaviorally relevant information is extracted from ECoG activity with decoding algorithms of different complexity. Several research groups have advanced toward the development of assistive devices driven by brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that decode motor commands from multichannel ECoG recordings. Here we review the evolution of this field and its recent tendencies, and discuss the potential areas for future development.

Indexed as

BCIbrain-computer interfaceECoGelectrocorticographymovement decoding

Identifiers

PMID31849632
PMCPMC6901702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.