Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31849622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2019

Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.

Brittany N Kuhn, Peter W Kalivas, Ana-Clara Bobadilla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Establishment and evaluation of rat and mouse models with addictive behaviors].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany N KuhnDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Peter W KalivasDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Ana-Clara BobadillaDepartment of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

DRUG ABUSE TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007288 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Christopher W Cowan, Rachel Penrod-Martin · 1991 to 2026
$11.8M
COCA: Project 4. Neurocircuit Strategy to Decrease Cocaine Cue ReactivityP50DA046373 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HANLON, COLLEEN A · 2019 to 2023
$9.9M
GLUTAMATE AND CRAVING FOR COCAINER01DA012513 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KALIVAS, PETER W · 2000 to 2024
$7.5M
OPIOIDS, AMPHETAMINE &COCAIN IN DRUG ABUSER01DA003906 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KALIVAS, PETER W · 1985 to 2019
$3.6M
COCAINE, OPIOIDS AND DRUG ABUSER37DA003906 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KALIVAS, PETER W · 2000 to 2009
$3.0M
Nucleus accumbens neuronal ensembles in drugs and natural rewards seeking.R00DA046522 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING · PI BATCHELDER, ABIGAIL · 2021 to 2023
$812k
Nucleus accumbens neuronal ensembles in drugs and natural rewards seeking.K99DA046522 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BATCHELDER, ABIGAIL · 2019 to 2020
$377k
BLRD VA I01 BX004727NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA046522NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA046373NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA046522NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003906NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012513NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA003906NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug addiction is a neuropsychiatric disorder with grave personal consequences that has an extraordinary global economic impact. Despite decades of research, the options available to treat addiction are often ineffective because our rudimentary understanding of drug-induced pathology in brain circuits and synaptic physiology inhibits the rational design of successful therapies. This understanding will arise first from animal models of addiction where experimentation at the level of circuits and molecular biology is possible. We will review the most common preclinical models of addictive behavior and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each. This includes non-contingent models in which animals are passively exposed to rewarding substances, as well as widely used contingent models such as drug self-administration and relapse. For the latter, we elaborate on the different ways of mimicking craving and relapse, which include using acute stress, drug administration or exposure to cues and contexts previously paired with drug self-administration. We further describe paradigms where drug-taking is challenged by alternative rewards, such as appetitive foods or social interaction. In an attempt to better model the individual vulnerability to drug abuse that characterizes human addiction, the field has also established preclinical paradigms in which drug-induced behaviors are ranked by various criteria of drug use in the presence of negative consequences. Separation of more vulnerable animals according to these criteria, along with other innate predispositions including goal- or sign-tracking, sensation-seeking behavior or impulsivity, has established individual genetic susceptibilities to developing drug addiction and relapse vulnerability. We further examine current models of behavioral addictions such as gambling, a disorder included in the DSM-5, and exercise, mentioned in the DSM-5 but not included yet due to insufficient peer-reviewed evidence. Finally, after reviewing the face validity of the aforementioned models, we consider the most common standardized tests used by pharmaceutical companies to assess the addictive potential of a drug during clinical trials.

Indexed as

addiction modelsdrug seeking behaviorDSM-Vpreclinical studiesrelapse activity

Identifiers

PMID31849622
PMCPMC6895146
OpenAlexW2989720669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.