ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential temporal responses of heel strike and toe off during split-belt locomotor adaptation.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of adaptive interlimb coordination to sudden ground loss: a neuromusculoskeletal modeling study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biomechanical and Sensory Feedback Regularize the Behavior of Different Locomotor Central Pattern Generators.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Contribution of Phase Resetting to Statistical Persistence in Stride Intervals: A Modeling Study.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022Article
- Contribution of Afferent Feedback to Adaptive Hindlimb Walking in Cats: A Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Computational Modeling of Spinal Locomotor Circuitry in the Age of Molecular Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Fast and Slow Adaptations of Interlimb CoordinationFrontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord generate rhythmic neural activity and control locomotion in vertebrates. These CPGs operate under the control of sensory feedback that affects the generated locomotor pattern and adapt it to the animal's biomechanics and environment. Studies of the effects of afferent stimulation on fictive locomotion in immobilized cats have shown that brief stimulation of peripheral nerves can reset the ongoing locomotor rhythm. Depending on the phase of stimulation and the stimulated nerve, the applied stimulation can either shorten or prolong the current locomotor phase and the locomotor cycle. Here, we used a mathematical model of a half-center CPG to investigate the phase-dependent effects of brief stimulation applied to CPG on the CPG-generated locomotor oscillations. The CPG in the model consisted of two half-centers mutually inhibiting each other. The rhythmic activity in each half-center was based on a slowly inactivating, persistent sodium current. Brief stimulation was applied to CPG half-centers in different phases of the locomotor cycle to produce phase-dependent changes in CPG activity. The model reproduced several results from experiments on the effect of afferent stimulation of fictive locomotion in cats. The mechanisms of locomotor rhythm resetting under different conditions were analyzed using dynamic systems theory methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.