ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2019
Developing a Hospital Disaster Risk Management Evaluation Model.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hospital disaster preparedness in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of English literature.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Fire safety knowledge and emergency preparedness assessment among health care workers at three hospitals in Kunene region, Namibia.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring influential components and indicators in hospital resilience assessment: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Toward hospital resilience: a qualitative study on the identification of hospital shocks during disruption era in Indonesia.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Strategic analysis of Iran's climate resilient health system.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Developing hospital resilience domains in facing disruption era in Indonesia: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Resiliency of the Iranian healthcare facilities against the Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and solutions.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Risk Assessment of COVID-19 in the Iranian Health System.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2022Article
- Role of hospitals in recovery from COVID-19: Reflections from hospital managers and frontliners in the Eastern Mediterranean Region on strengthening hospital resilience.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- What is "hospital resilience"? A scoping review on conceptualization, operationalization, and evaluation.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Factors Affecting the Decontamination Process in Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDisasters are increasing worldwide and hospitals should be prepared to respond well to such disasters. An effective hospital disaster risk management program saves peoples' lives, reduces damage to the hospital properties and assures hospital service continuity. This article aimed to develop and verify a Hospital Disaster Risk Management Evaluation model (HDRME).
methodsA mixed-method explanatory sequential approach was used to develop and verify the HDRME model. The first draft of the HDRME model was introduced through a comprehensive literature review of major databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct), using appropriate keywords. Furthermore, 18 in-depth individual interviews were conducted with well-known experts in DRM to identify more HDRME constructs, sub-constructs, and standards. Then, three rounds of Delphi were conducted with 22 experts in hospital disaster risk management to verify the proposed model.
resultsThe proposed HDRME consists of eight constructs, including seven enablers (management and leadership; risk assessment; planning; prevention and mitigation; preparedness; response, and recovery) and one result (key performance results). These constructs were further broken into 27 sub-constructs. The enablers and results scored 85% and 15% of the model's total scores.
conclusionA comprehensive conceptual framework for the evaluation of hospital disaster risk management was introduced and verified. Standards and measurable elements can be embedded in this conceptual model to measure a hospital's preparedness in disasters and accordingly, corrective actions can be taken to strengthen the hospitals' responses to the disasters. However, the proposed model should be validated in a hospital setting through implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.