ArticleCancer management and research2019
The Value of DNA Quantitative Cytology Test for the Screening of Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA aneuploidy combined with radial EBUS in the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2022Article
- HypermethylatedFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Novel DNA Damage-Related Subtypes Characterization Identifies Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC) Based on Machine Learning.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DNA quantitative cytology test for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer or precancerous lesions and then discuss the value of DNA quantitative cytology as a screening tool for endometrial cancer.
methodsThe study enrolled 575 patients from September 2013 to January 2017 in Shanghai Minhang Central Hospital. Endometrial hysteroscopy plus dilation and curettage and DNA quantitative cytology tests were conducted as a method for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of this method were calculated according to histopathologic diagnoses which were used as the gold standard for diagnosis confirmation.
resultsFor the DNA quantitative cytology diagnosis of endometrial cancer, accuracy was estimated at 85.57%, sensitivity at 87.01%, specificity at 85.34%, positive predictive value (PPV) at 47.86%, and negative predictive value (NPV) at 97.07%. For the DNA quantitative cytology diagnosis of endometrial cancer in menopausal patients: accuracy was estimated at 89.95%, sensitivity at 97.73%, specificity at 87.59%, positive predictive value (PPV) at 70.49%, negative predictive value (NPV) at 99.22%. For the DNA quantitative cytology diagnosis of endometrial cancer in non-menopausal patients, accuracy was estimated at 83.42%, sensitivity at 72.73%, specificity at 84.42%, positive predictive value (PPV) at 30.38%, and negative predictive value (NPV) at 97.07%.
conclusionDNA heteroploidy can be tested for the occurrence and the development of endometrial cancer. A small number of non-endometrial cancer cases may also appear DNA heteroploidy, but the number of >5c cells is less than 3. DNA quantitative analysis is a useful tool for the screening of endometrial cancer, worthy of being popularized and applied in endometrial cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.