ReviewJournal of asthma and allergy2019
Parasitic (Helminthic) Infection While on Asthma Biologic Treatment: Not Everything Is What It Seems.
Review in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory exacerbation of hepatic alveolar echinococcosis during dupilumab therapy: A case report.IDCases · 2026Article
- An Unexpected Dupilumab Reaction.Cureus · 2026Article
- Exploring dupilumab for asthma: from mechanistic insights to clinical outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- IgG Antibody Titers AgainstTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Biologic therapies for severe asthma with persistent type 2 inflammation.Australian prescriber · 2024Review
- Parasitic Infections and Biological Therapies Targeting Type 2 Inflammation: A VigiBase Study.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
- Parasitic infections related to anti-type 2 immunity monoclonal antibodies: a disproportionality analysis in the food and drug administration's adverse event reporting system (FAERS).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Adult Severe Asthma Registries: A Global and Growing Inventory.Pragmatic and observational research · 2023Article
- Domestic Parasitic Infections in Patients with Asthma and Eosinophilia in Germany - Three Cases with Learnings in the Era of Anti- IL5 Treatments.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Article
- Can omalizumab be used effectively to treat severe conjunctivitis in children with asthma? A case example and review of the literature.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2021Review
- Self-Administered Mepolizumab in the Management of Severe Asthma: Usability and Patient Acceptance.Patient preference and adherence · 2020Review
- Helminth Induced Immunoregulation and Novel Therapeutic Avenue of Allergy.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airway that is characterized by bronchial hyperresponsiveness and variable airflow limitation. Approximately 235 million people are affected by asthma worldwide and 5-10% are considered to be refractory to standard asthma treatment. These patients are known to have repeated exacerbations requiring multiple courses of systemic corticosteroids and as a result, are at risk for increased adverse effects (i.e., osteoporosis, infections). Several new medications known as biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthmatics. These biologic agents target essential parts of the cell-mediated allergic and to a lesser degree non-allergic immune response (IgE, IL-5, and IL-4/IL-13). They are gaining more favor in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma due to their efficacy and excellent safety profile. Despite the most common adverse events being minor, such as injection site reactions, upper respiratory infections, or headaches, these agents carry a small risk of more severe complications such as anaphylaxis and decreased defense against parasitic infections (PI). The incidence of PI compared with other rare adverse events is not well reported, and there are no consensus guidelines for risk prevention of PI in asthmatics undergoing evaluation for, or currently using, biologic therapy. Thus, this article sets out to review the incidence of reported PI and other rare adverse events among asthmatics using current FDA-approved biologic therapies. Secondly, we discuss the clinical implications for the importance of risk prevention of PI with the use of biologic therapies in asthmatics. Lastly, we share an educational handout to assist providers in informing their patients of behaviors that could potentially increase their risk of PI while being on a biologic agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.