Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31849457›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2019

Atypical Ulcers: Diagnosis and Management.

Agata Janowska, Valentina Dini, Teresa Oranges, Michela Iannone, Barbara Loggini, Marco Romanelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Approach to the Atypical Wound.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
  11. The Histopathology of Leg Ulcers.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chronic wounds.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agata JanowskaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Valentina DiniDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Teresa OrangesDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7277-3278
Michela IannoneDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Barbara LogginiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3629-8502
Marco RomanelliDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-0141
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atypical ulcers show atypical clinical features, histology, localization, and resistance to standard therapies. The persistence of a chronic ulcer despite treatment with standard therapies requires a more specific diagnostic investigation. Diagnosis involves obtaining the history and performing clinical examination and additional tests. A skin biopsy is frequently used to confirm unclear diagnosis. In difficult cases, microbiological and immunohistochemical examinations, laboratory blood tests, or instrumental tests should be evaluated. The treatment of atypical wounds is characterized by local systemic therapy and pain control. Our results highlight the need for early diagnosis, and standardized and targeted management by a multidisciplinary wound healing center.

Indexed as

Wound HealingBandagesBiopsyHumansMiddle AgedPhysical ExaminationSkinUlceratypical ulcerswound bed preparationwound healingwound management

Identifiers

PMID31849457
PMCPMC6911347
OpenAlexW2991839202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.