ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2020
Sex differences in head-fixed voluntary running behavior in C57BL/6J mice.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mical1 deletion in tyrosinase expressing cells affects mouse running gaits.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2024Article
- Differential disruptions in population coding along the dorsal-ventral axis of CA1 in the APP/PS1 mouse model of Aβ pathology.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Continuous locomotor activity monitoring to assess animal welfare following intracranial surgery in mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- High-resolution structural and functional retinal imaging in the awake behaving mouse.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Delay eyeblink conditioning performance and brain-wide c-Fos expression in male and female mice.Open biology · 2023Article
- Changes in pairwise correlations during running reshape global network state in the main olfactory bulb.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Sex differences in head-fixed voluntary running behavior in C57BL/6J mice.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sex differences in running behaviors between female and male mice occur naturally in the wild. Recent experiments using head-fixed mice on a voluntary running wheel have exploited analogous locomotor activity to gain insight into the neural underpinnings of a number of behaviors ranging from spatial navigation to decision-making. It is however largely unknown if sex differences exist between females and males in a head-fixed experimental paradigm. To address this, we characterized locomotor activity in head-fixed female and male C57BL/6J mice on a voluntary running wheel. First, we found that over the initial 7-day period, on average, animals increased both the velocity and the time spent running. Furthermore, we found that female mice habituated to running forward over the initial 2 days of encountering the wheel, while male mice took up to 4 days to habituate to running forward. Taken together, we characterized features of a sexually divergent behavior in head-fixed running that should be considered in experiments employing female and male mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.