Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848998›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

"In the same boat"-a mixed-methods exploration of reasons why male gastrointestinal cancer patients joined a professionally led men-only cancer support group.

Celestina Martopullo, Devesh Oberoi, Gregory Levin, Maryam Qureshi, Elizabeth Morgan-Maver, Olympia Korzeniewski, Guy Pelletier, Linda E Carlson, Barry D Bultz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Humanistic nursing tailored to the needs of young men with cancer.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  3. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Celestina MartopulloDivision of Psychosocial Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Devesh OberoiDivision of Psychosocial Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Gregory LevinSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent St., Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Maryam QureshiUniversity of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, 2N 1N4, Canada.
Elizabeth Morgan-MaverUniversity of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, 2N 1N4, Canada.
Olympia KorzeniewskiUniversity of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, 2N 1N4, Canada.
Guy PelletierDivision of Psychosocial Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Linda E CarlsonDivision of Psychosocial Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Barry D BultzDivision of Psychosocial Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada. Barry.Bultz@albertahealthservices.ca.
University of Calgary · CACurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients often suffer high rates of distress and social isolation, partially due to symptoms that are embarrassing or difficult to discuss with family or friends. Group support therapies mitigate illness-related stigma and standardization; however, men, in particular, are more averse to joining. Through an ongoing men-only GI cancer support group, this study sought to understand who joined the groups, what facilitated group uptake, and explore men's reasons for enrolling in the group.

methodsA mixed-methods study design and analysis were used. A qualitative design utilizing open-ended, semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis were used; Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) directed the inquiry towards facets of group uptake. Standardized measures were also used to assess distress, coping, and quality of life (QoL) and compared with normative values for cancer and general population. Data from qualitative and quantitative findings were triangulated.

resultsParticipants included 35 male GI cancer patients, aged 28-72, at varying stages of illness and treatment. Themes related to group uptake and enrollment were endorsement; composition; and attitudes, and reasons for joining were learning new coping techniques and affiliations with similar others. Men's QoL and psychological distress scores were on par with cancer patient norms. The scores obtained from quantitative scales corroborated with our qualitative findings.

conclusionsDespite psychosocial, demographic, and clinical variations, participants were keen on joining a male-only Supportive-Expressive Therapy (SET) group to address their emotional, informational, and supportive care needs and express their solidarity for other patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings bear clinical relevance for designing GI male-centered group formats that endorse men's needs and facilitate their accessibility to group support interventions.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSelf-Help GroupsCancerCancer support groupCoping with cancerGastrointestinal cancerMen and cancerMen-only support groupQualitative

Identifiers

PMID31848998
OpenAlexW2996469112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.