Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848997›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

Do esophageal cancer survivors work after esophagectomy and do health problems impact their work? A cross-sectional study.

B F Kingma, P Rauwerdink, H J F Brenkman, J P Ruurda, R van Hillegersberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Working after cancer: psychological flexibility and the quality of working life.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B F KingmaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. B.F.Kingma-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7958-4584
P RauwerdinkDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H J F BrenkmanDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. R.vanHillegersberg@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the occupational status and work impediments due to health problems in long-term esophageal cancer survivors.

methodsThe Short-Form Health and Labour Questionnaire (SF-HLQ) was sent to esophageal cancer survivors. Primary outcomes included the number of working esophageal cancer survivors and the patient-reported impact of health problems on work, as evaluated by the SF-HLQ. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared between survivors who worked and survivors who did not work at the time of follow-up after esophagectomy.

resultsThe SF-HLQ was sent to 98 survivors and was completed by 86 of them. Of the 86 included survivors, 35 worked at the time of cancer diagnosis and 18 worked at a median follow-up of 48 months [range 23-87] after treatment. Survivors who worked at the time of follow-up were younger at the time of treatment when compared to survivors who had quit working after their cancer diagnosis (58.4 vs. 64.2 years, P = 0.006). Working survivors most commonly reported reduced work pace (44%), a self-imposed need to work in seclusion (33%), and concentration problems (28%) due to health problems at work. The majority of working survivors (93%) reported an efficiency score ≥ 8 on a scale from 1 (lowest efficiency) to 10 (highest efficiency).

conclusionsNearly half of the esophageal cancer survivors who worked at the time of diagnosis also worked at a median follow-up of 48 months after esophagectomy. Despite health problems impacting work, most esophageal cancer survivors reported high efficiency at work. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Esophageal cancer survivors can often work with high efficiency, despite potential health problems.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeCancer survivorshipEsophageal cancerFunctional recoveryPostoperative recoveryWork

Identifiers

PMID31848997
OpenAlexW2995911464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.