ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020
KIT Mutation Incidence and Pattern of Melanoma in Central Europe.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nilotinib in KIT-driven advanced melanoma: Results from the phase II single-arm NICAM trial.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Trial
- Review
- Histopathological Subtypes of Cutaneous Melanoma: Prognostic and Molecular Implications.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Acral Melanoma in Skin of Color: Current Insights and Future Directions: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- BRAF V600E Mutation in Malignant Melanoma-A Romanian Research Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Novel somatic Missense Mutations in Exon 11 of the KIT Gene are Detected in Melanoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- The Driverless Triple-Wild-Type (BRAF, RAS, KIT) Cutaneous Melanoma: Whole Genome Sequencing Discoveries.Cancers · 2023Article
- Molecular Pathology of Skin Melanoma: Epidemiology, Differential Diagnostics, Prognosis and Therapy Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Relevance of BRAF Subcellular Localization and Its Interaction withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Identification of genes and pathways leading to metastasis and poor prognosis in melanoma.Aging · 2021Article
- The Mechanisms for the Association of Cancer and Esophageal Dysmotility Disorders.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Cutaneous Melanoma Classification: The Importance of High-Throughput Genomic Technologies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Anti-Melanoma Effect of Minocycline-A Study of Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis on Human Melanotic Melanoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Data on the KIT mutation rate in melanoma in the central European region is missing. Accordingly, in a cohort of 79 BRAF/NRAS double wild type cutaneous melanoma and 17 mucosal melanoma KIT mutation was assessed by Sanger sequencing of exons 9,11,13,17 and 18. In this cutaneous melanoma cohort KIT mutation frequency was found to be 34/79 (43.04%) with a significantly higher rate in acrolentiginous melanoma (ALM) as compared to UV-induced common variants (20/34, 58.8% versus 14/45, 31.1%, p = 0.014). In the double wild type mucosal melanoma cohort the KIT mutation frequency was found to be comparable (41.2%). The actual frequency of KIT mutation in the original 227 patient cutaneous melanoma cohort was 34/227, 14.9%. Exon 11 was the most frequent mutation site (44.7%) followed by exon 9 (21.1%) equally characterizing UV-induced common histotypes and ALM tumors. In mucosal melanoma exon 9 was the most frequently involved exon followed by exon 13 and 17. KIT mutation hotspots were identified in exon 9 (c482/491/492), in exon 11 (c559,c572, c570), in exon 13 (c642), in exon 17 (c822) and in exon 18 (c853). The relatively high KIT mutation rate in cutaneous melanoma in this central-European cohort justifies regular testing of this molecular target in this entity, not only in mucosal variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.