ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020
Poem Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: A Case-Control Study from Two High Volume Centers Using the Propensity Score.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- POEM vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication for achalasia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and prospective studies.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes after per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy and pneumatic dilation in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical characteristics and manometric findings of esophageal achalasia-a systematic review regarding differences among three subtypes.Journal of smooth muscle research = Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai kikanshi · 2023Pooled it
- Five-year follow-up results of the Italian case-control study comparing poem and laparoscopic Heller myotomy using the propensity score.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Upper Esophageal Sphincter Abnormalities and Esophageal Motility Recovery After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Evolving therapeutic approaches in achalasia: a comprehensive review of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs. Heller's myotomy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease over time in endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for treatment of achalasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2025Review
- Review
- Seven-Year Experience of Intramural Surgery in the Middle East: A Safety and Feasibility Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Navigating reflux disease after achalasia treatments: Balancing risks and benefits.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- SHORT AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGOCARDIOMYOTOMY WITH FUNDOPLICATION (HELLER-PINOTTI SURGERY) IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-ADVANCED ACHALASIA (MEGAESOPHAGUS).Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication following an unsuccessful peroral endoscopic myotomy.Surgical case reports · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Heller-Dor is an effective long-term treatment for end-stage achalasia.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Periprocedural safety profile of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)-a retrospective analysis of adverse events according to two different classifications.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Review
- Esophageal Achalasia: Pros and Cons of the Treatment Options.World journal of surgery · 2022Review
- Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- POEM, GPOEM, and ZPOEM.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPOEM has recently had a widespread diffusion, aiming at being the treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia. The results of ongoing RCTs against laparoscopic myotomy are not available, yet. We, therefore, designed this propensity score (PS) case-control study with the aim of evaluating how POEM compares to the long-standing laparoscopic Heller myotomy + Dor fundoplication (LHD) and verifying if it may really replace the latter as the first-line treatment for achalasia.
methodsTwo groups of consecutive patients undergoing treatment for primary achalasia from January 2014 to November 2017 were recruited in two high-volume centers, one with extensive experience with POEM and one with LHD. Patients with previous endoscopic treatment were included, whereas patients with previous LHD or POEM were excluded. A total of 140 patients in both centers were thus matched. LHD and POEM were performed following established techniques. The patients were followed with clinical (Eckardt score), endoscopic, and pH-manometry evaluations.
resultsThe procedure was successfully completed in all the patients. POEM required a shorter operation time and postoperative stay compared to LHD (p < 0.001). No mortality was recorded in either group. Seven complications were recorded in the POEM group (five mucosal perforations) and 3 in the LHD group (3 mucosal perforations)(p = 0.33). Two patients in the POEM group and one in the LHD were lost to follow-up. One patient in both groups died during the follow-up for unrelated causes. At a median follow-up of 24 months [15-30] for POEM and 31 months [15-41] for LHD (p < 0.05), 99.3% of the POEM patients and 97.7% of the LHD patients showed an Eckardt score ≤ 3 (p < 0.12). Four years after the treatment, the probability to have symptoms adequately controlled was > 90% for both groups (p = 0.2, Log-rank test). HR-Manometry showed a similar reduction in the LES pressure and 4sIRP; 24-h pH-monitoring showed however an abnormal exposure to acid in 38.4% of POEM patients, as compared to 17.1% of LHD patients (p < 0.01) and esophagitis was found in 37.4% of the POEM and 15.2% of LHD patients (p < 0.05).
conclusionPOEM provides the same midterm results as LHD. This study confirms, however, a higher incidence of postoperative GERD with the former, even if its real significance needs to be further evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.