ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020
Mitespotting: approaches for Aculops lycopersici monitoring in tomato cultivation.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laboratory evaluation of Beauveria bassiana strain ATCC74040 as a potential biocontrol agent of Aculops lycopersici.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Restriction of russet mite and influence on predatory mite dispersal using different stem barriers in tomato crop.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025Article
- Article
- Control ofInsects · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aculops lycopersici is a major pest in tomato cultivation worldwide, and lately its relevance in German tomato cultivation has increased markedly. Aculops lycopersici causes damage to tomato plants by feeding on the surface of leaves, stem and fruits and can lead to the loss of whole plants. Given the small size of the pest, A. lycopersici infestation may go unnoticed for quite a length of time. When discovered symptoms can be easily confused with those of diseases. In addition to these issues A. lycopersici has a very high reproduction rate. In this study, fluorescence measurements were performed on the stem of A. lycopersici-inoculated potted tomato plants and these were compared with a visual bare eye assessment and a sticky tape imprint method for classification of these plants as either infested or healthy. The best correct classification rate was achieved with sticky tape, but this method is time intensive, which makes it unsuitable for large-scale monitoring in practice. Classification based on a ridge regression performed on stem fluorescence measurements was at least as good as the classification based on the visual assessment, and detection was robust against symptoms of drought stress. In a second trial the specificity of stem fluorescence measurements for A. lycopersici against Trialeurodes vaporariorum was tested successfully. The fluorescence method is promising as this method allows for high automation and thereby has the potential to increase monitoring efficacy in practice considerably. The relevance of the tested monitoring methods for practical tomato cultivation and the next steps to be taken are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31848866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.