Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848833›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

Reproductive and productive performance, udder health, and conformation traits of purebred Holstein, F1, and R1 crossbred Holstein × Simmental cows.

Deise Aline Knob, Armin Manfred Scholz, Dileta Regina Moro Alessio, Bruna Paula Bergamaschi Mendes, Laiz Perazzoli, Roberto Kappes, Andre Thaler Neto

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deise Aline KnobUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Avenida Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages, Santa Catarina, Cep: 88520-000, Brazil. deisealinek@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3972-1094
Armin Manfred ScholzLudwig Maximilians Universität München, Tierärztlichen Fakultät, Lehr- und Versuchsgut Oberschleißheim, St-Hubertus Straße, 12, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Dileta Regina Moro AlessioCentro Universitário Leonardo da Vinci, Rua Marechal Deodoro da Fonseca, 252, Indaial, Santa Catarina, Cep- 89130-000, Brazil.
Bruna Paula Bergamaschi MendesUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Avenida Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages, Santa Catarina, Cep: 88520-000, Brazil.
Laiz PerazzoliUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Avenida Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages, Santa Catarina, Cep: 88520-000, Brazil.
Roberto KappesUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Avenida Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages, Santa Catarina, Cep: 88520-000, Brazil.
Andre Thaler NetoUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Avenida Luis de Camões, 2090, Lages, Santa Catarina, Cep: 88520-000, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the reproductive performance, milk yield and composition, and udder health and conformation traits of Holstein (Ho), F1, and R1 crossbred Ho × Simmental (Sim) cows. Three commercial dairy farms in south Brazil were used as the research units. All farms held Ho, F1, and R1 crossbred Ho × Sim (¾ Ho × ¼ Sim and ¾ Sim × ¼ Ho) cows. The collection of milk samples and evaluation of udder conformation traits occurred during four visits to each farm. In addition to the actively collected data, retrospective reproduction records of the farms served as the basis for the statistical analysis using analysis of variance models using SAS. The F1 crossbred Ho × Sim cows and ¾ Sim (first rotational crossbreeding generation = R1 using Sim semen) cows had a shorter calving interval and calving to first service interval compared to the Ho cows (P < 0.0001). Milk yield did not differ among the genetic groups except for R1 (¾ Sim) that produced approximately 10% less milk than the other groups (P = 0.0245). Fat plus protein yield and somatic cell score did not differ among the genetic groups. Ho cows had shallower udders (P < 0.0001) and a higher udder clearance (P < 0.0001) than the other groups. F1 and R1 crossbred Ho × Sim cows had shorter reproduction intervals than purebred Ho cows. Although udder conformation traits lacked high-quality scores in crossbred cows, somatic cell scores reached the same level as in purebred Ho cows.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrazilCattleCrosses, GeneticFarmsFemaleLactationMammary Glands, AnimalMilkPhenotypeReproductionRetrospective StudiesDays openHeterosisMilk compositionMilk yieldSomatic cell score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.