Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848822›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

A Novel Prediction Tool Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine the Biopsy Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PSA Levels Less than 50 ng/ml.

Bi-Ming He, Zhen-Kai Shi, Hu-Sheng Li, Heng-Zhi Lin, Qing-Song Yang, Jian-Ping Lu, Ying-Hao Sun, Hai-Feng Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bi-Ming HeDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-7290
Zhen-Kai ShiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hu-Sheng LiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Heng-Zhi LinDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qing-Song YangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Ping LuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ying-Hao SunDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China. sunyhsmmu@126.com.
Hai-Feng WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 446720864@qq.com.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

Chinese Shanghai Municipal Planning Commission of science and Research Fund 201540182Program for Chinese National Natural Science Fund 81602220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and internally validate nomograms to help choose the optimal biopsy strategy among no biopsy, targeted biopsy (TB) only, or TB plus systematic biopsy (SB). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included a total of 385 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided TB and/or SB at our institute after undergoing multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) between 2015 and 2018. We developed models to predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) based on suspicious lesions from a TB result and based on the whole prostate gland from the results of TB plus SB or SB only. Nomograms were generated using logistic regression and evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curves and decision analysis. The results were validated using ROC curve and calibration on 177 patients from 2018 to 2019 at the same institute.

resultsIn the multivariate analyses, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score were predictors of csPCa in both nomograms. Age was also included in the model for suspicious lesions, while obesity was included in the model for the whole gland. The area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analyses of the prediction models was 0.755 for suspicious lesions and 0.887 for the whole gland. Both models performed well in the calibration and decision analyses. In the validation cohort, the ROC curve described the AUCs of 0.723 and 0.917 for the nomogram of suspicious lesions and nomogram of the whole gland, respectively. Also, the calibration curve detected low error rates for both models.

conclusionNomograms with excellent discriminative ability were developed and validated. These nomograms can be used to select the optimal biopsy strategy for individual patients in the future.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsAgedDecision Support TechniquesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31848822
OpenAlexW2996508618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.