Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848815›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Body or Tail on Surgical and Oncological Outcome: A Propensity-Score Matched Multicenter Study.

Sanne Lof, Maarten Korrel, Jony van Hilst, Adnan Alseidi, Gianpaolo Balzano, Ugo Boggi, Giovanni Butturini, Riccardo Casadei, Safi Dokmak, Bjørn Edwin and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Sanne LofDepartment of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5688-8761
Maarten KorrelDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jony van HilstDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adnan AlseidiDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gianpaolo BalzanoPancreatic Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy.
Ugo BoggiDepartment of Surgery, Universitá di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giovanni ButturiniDepartment of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera, Italy.
Riccardo CasadeiDepartment of Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Safi DokmakDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Bjørn EdwinDepartment of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Massimo FalconiPancreatic Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy.
Tobias KeckClinic for Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Giuseppe MalleoDepartment of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Matteo de PastenaDepartment of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Ales TomazicDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Hanneke WilminkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alessandro ZerbiDepartment of Surgery, Humanitas University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2650-9350
Mohammed Abu HilalDepartment of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. abuhilal9@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-4639
European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Verona · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITHôpital Beaujon · FRHumanitas University · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIOLVG · NLOslo University Hospital · NOUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DEUniversity of Pisa · ITVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have suggested a survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic head. Data concerning NAT for PDAC located in pancreatic body or tail are lacking.

methodsPost hoc analysis of an international multicenter retrospective cohort of distal pancreatectomy for PDAC in 34 centers from 11 countries (2007-2015). Patients who underwent resection after NAT were matched (1:1 ratio), using propensity scores based on baseline characteristics, to patients who underwent upfront resection. Median overall survival was compared using the stratified log-rank test.

resultsAmong 1236 patients, 136 (11.0%) received NAT, most frequently FOLFIRINOX (25.7%). In total, 94 patients receiving NAT were matched to 94 patients undergoing upfront resection. NAT was associated with less postoperative major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a, 10.6% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.020) and pancreatic fistula grade B/C (9.6% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.026). NAT did not improve overall survival [27 (95% CI 14-39) versus 31 months (95% CI 19-42), P = 0.277], as compared with upfront resection. In a sensitivity analysis of 251 patients with radiographic tumor involvement of splenic vessels, NAT (n = 37, 14.7%) was associated with prolonged overall survival [36 (95% CI 18-53) versus 20 months (95% CI 15-24), P = 0.049], as compared with upfront resection.

conclusionIn this international multicenter cohort study, NAT for resected PDAC in pancreatic body or tail was associated with less morbidity and pancreatic fistula but similar overall survival in comparison with upfront resection. Prospective studies should confirm a survival benefit of NAT in patients with PDAC and splenic vessel involvement.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFluorouracilHumansInternationalityIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOxaliplatinPancreasPancreatectomyFluorouracilfolfirinoxIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID31848815
PMCPMC7210228
OpenAlexW2994683002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.