Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848795›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2020

Acquisition and generalization of cough trigger beliefs in allergic rhinitis.

Thomas Janssens, Lieven Dupont, Sofie Goossens, Yasmine Sterckx, Omer Van den Bergh

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas JanssensHealth Psychology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, Box 3726, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. thomas.janssens@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-3140-9952
Lieven DupontPulmonary Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sofie GoossensHealth Psychology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, Box 3726, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Yasmine SterckxHealth Psychology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, Box 3726, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Omer Van den BerghHealth Psychology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, Box 3726, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In allergic conditions, trigger identification is often inaccurate, and may be influenced by pre-existing beliefs. In this study, we investigated the acquisition and generalization of symptom trigger beliefs in individuals with allergic rhinitis (n = 24) and control participants (n = 24). In a lab-based trigger acquisition task, unique exemplars of two trigger categories were either paired with saline inhalation (CS- category) or citric acid inhalation (CS+ category). The next day, we tested recognition and symptom expectancy for CS category exemplars and exemplars of novel trigger categories. Participants acquired differential symptom expectancies for CS+ compared to CS- exemplars, with faster acquisition in participants with rhinitis. Differential symptom expectancies persisted the next day, and generalized to novel trigger categories, with stronger generalization in rhinitis vs. control participants. These patterns of acquisition and generalization suggest that overgeneralization of trigger beliefs may complicate trigger identification in participants with allergic conditions.

Indexed as

Generalization, PsychologicalAdultCoughFemaleHumansMaleRhinitis, AllergicAllergyAssociative learningCoughGeneralizationRhinitisTrigger identification

Identifiers

PMID31848795
OpenAlexW2995150842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.