ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2020
Machine learning classifiers-based prediction of normal-tension glaucoma progression in young myopic patients.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in glaucoma: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Performance of OCT-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Detecting and Predicting Glaucoma Progression: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A systematic review of AI for predicting glaucoma progression: challenges and recommendations towards clinical implementation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Classification of fundus autofluorescence images based on macular function in retinitis pigmentosa using convolutional neural networks.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- A scoping review of advancements in machine learning for glaucoma: current trends and future direction.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Technology in Glaucoma: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Predicting glaucoma progression using deep learning framework guided by generative algorithm.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Application of a deep learning system in glaucoma screening and further classification with colour fundus photographs: a case control study.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Finite element modeling of effects of tissue property variation on human optic nerve tethering during adduction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparison of Medical Comorbidity between Patients with Normal-Tension Glaucoma and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Population-Based Study in Taiwan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Assessing Glaucoma Progression Using Machine Learning Trained on Longitudinal Visual Field and Clinical Data.Ophthalmology · 2021Article
- A Review of Deep Learning for Screening, Diagnosis, and Detection of Glaucoma Progression.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the performance of machine learning classifiers for prediction of progression of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) in young myopic patients. STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
methodsOne hundred and fifty-five eyes of 155 myopic NTG patients (axial length [AL] ≥ 24.00 mm and refractive error ≤ - 3.0 D) between the ages of 20 and 40 were enrolled and divided into training (110) and test (45) sets. Sixty-five eyes showed glaucoma progression as defined by standard automated perimetry, while 91 eyes (nonprogressors) had been stable over the course of a follow-up period of at least 3 years. Two machine learning classifiers were built using the random forest and extremely randomized trees (extra-trees) models. Baseline clinical measurements obtained only at the initial visit were used as input features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of prediction.
resultsMean age and AL did not significantly differ between the 2 groups on either the training or the test set. The extra-trees model achieved an AUC of 0.881 [95% CI 0.814-0.945], higher than that of the random forest model (0.811 [0.731-0.888]; P = 0.010). The extra-trees model also outperformed all the clinical measurements for prediction of NTG progression, including average macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (0.735 [0.639-0.831]) and average circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (0.691 [0.590-0.792]; both P < 0.001).
conclusionsIn young myopic patients, the machine learning classifier with the extra-trees model can predict glaucomatous progression more effectively than clinical diagnostic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31848786What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.