Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848678›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2020

Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial.

Mujgan Caliskan, Koray Kosmaz, Ismail Ege Subasi, Aylin Acar, Ismail Evren, Gurhan Bas, Ali Timucin Atayoglu

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05474911 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized comparative clinical study between two treatment strategies in patients with pilonidal sinus: conventional care versus negative pressure therapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSebastiano BiondoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsPilonidal Sinus, Wound HealArmsNegative pressure therapy, Conventional wound care
NCT05851690 nacompletednot on this map

Bilaterally Parallel Elliptic Flap Versus Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAtlas UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled102ConditionsPilonidal SinusArmsSurgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mujgan CaliskanDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Koray KosmazDepartment of General Surgery, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ismail Ege SubasiDepartment of General Surgery, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aylin AcarDepartment of General Surgery, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ismail EvrenDepartment of Urology, Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gurhan BasDepartment of General Surgery, Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Timucin AtayogluDepartment of Family Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. atatayoglu@medipol.edu.tr.
Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TRBakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIstanbul Medeniyet University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPilonidal disease is a common problem in primary health care which may require immediate surgical referral. Although various management options have been proposed, so far there is no gold standard treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine which of the following techniques was superior as regards postoperative complications and recurrence, midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap or Karydakis flap.

methodsA randomized clinical trial was conducted in the Department of General Surgery. Patients with non-complicated pilonidal sinus were enrolled in the study from April 2009 to January 2012. All patients were randomized the day of surgery at the coordinating center by means of a computer program. Patients were randomized to receive midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap or Karydakis flap. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia and patients were discharged 6 h after surgery. Demographic characteristics, skin color, body hair type, family history, preoperative complaints and duration of symptoms, cyst size, intraoperative iatrogenic cyst rupture, the presence of a tuft of hairs in the cyst, surgical techniques, duration of drainage, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and recurrence were evaluated.

resultsOne hundred and ninety-two patients with non-complicated pilonidal sinus were enrolled. Seventy-two patients were randomized to midline unshifted adipofascial turn-over flap, 67 patients to midline shifted adipofascial turn-over flap and 53 patients to Karydakis flap. The mean age was 25.66 ± 7.67 years. At 76-month follow-up, the overall complications and recurrence rates were not significantly different between groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionIn cases of non-complicated pilonidal sinus, we recommend surgical management using local anesthesia, outpatient surgery and the surgical approach with which the surgeon is most familiar.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMalePilonidal SinusPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceSurgical FlapsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31848678
OpenAlexW2995732874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.