Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848643›Full record

ArticleHNO2020

[Is the number of tonsillectomies and tonsillotomies a relevant issue? German version].

J P Windfuhr, Y-S Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J P WindfuhrKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Viersener Str. 450, 41063, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland. jochen.windfuhr@mariahilf.de.
Y-S ChenPraxis für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Bad Honnef, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA second-opinion procedure was introduced for (adeno)tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy in 2018 by the Federal Joint Committee, due to the assumed high prevalence of both procedures. This study was conducted to quantify and analyze both types of tonsil surgery in Germany.

methodsData from the Federal Office of Statistics on the number of procedures and population size were used to calculate annual intervention rates between 2005 and 2017. Percentual changes in intervention rates compared to the previous year were calculated for Germany, for the total number of ENT specialists, for the ENT specialists of the federal states, and for four age groups (≤10; ≤20; ≤40; >40 years).

resultsRegression analysis revealed a significant decrease in (adeno)tonsillectomy and a significant increase in tonsillotomy in each investigated year (p < 0.001; exception: 2006 for adenotonsillectomy). Surgical rates of tonsillectomy and tonsillotomy decreased significantly with age (p < 0.001). There was no clear relationship between the density of ENT specialists in the different federal states and the number of surgical procedures.

conclusionThere was no clear association between the surgical prevalence and the density of ENT specialists. The significant decrease in rates of (adeno)tonsillectomy began in 2005 and the tonsillotomy rates have been increasing since 2007, albeit without a compensatory effect. Both procedures are on the list of the 50 most frequently performed operations. The decreasing total number of both surgical procedures questions the value of a second-opinion procedure as suggested by the Federal Joint Committee. Tonsil surgery is significantly associated with young age (<10 years) and discussions on surgery rates must consider the age structure of the investigated population, since this is the most important influencing factor in tonsil surgery.

Indexed as

AdenoidsTonsillectomyTonsillitisGermanyHumansPalatine TonsilAdenoidsGuideline as topicHyperplasiaPalatine tonsilTonsillitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.