Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848639›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2020

Complications of percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tubes in children.

Sachin S Kumbhar, Matthew R Plunk, Rahul Nikam, Kevin P Boyd, Pooja D Thakrar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Complications of Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy: The Prevalence in Children.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2023
    Article
  4. Enteral tube feeding selection at NICU discharge and resource utilization.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sachin S KumbharMedical College of Wisconsin, 8915 W. Connell Ct., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Matthew R PlunkMedical College of Wisconsin, 8915 W. Connell Ct., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Rahul NikamNemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Kevin P BoydMedical College of Wisconsin, 8915 W. Connell Ct., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Pooja D ThakrarMedical College of Wisconsin, 8915 W. Connell Ct., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. pthakrar@chw.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9935-9870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous feeding tubes are generally considered a safe option for enteral feeding and are widely used in children who require long-term nutritional support. However, complications are not infrequent and can range from bothersome to life-threatening. Radiologists should be familiar with the imaging appearances of potential complications for optimal patient care. In this review, we discuss radiologic appearances of common complications and less frequent but serious complications related to percutaneous feeding tubes. Additionally, as fluoroscopic feeding tube evaluation is often requested as the initial imaging study, we also discuss the fluoroscopic appearances of some uncommon complications.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEnteral NutritionEquipment FailureFemaleFluoroscopyGastrointestinal TractGastrostomyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleMedical ErrorsChildrenComplicationsFeeding tubeGastrojejunostomyGastrostomyInterventional radiologyPercutaneousStomach

Identifiers

PMID31848639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.