Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848631›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2020

Timing to perform VATS for traumatic-retained hemothorax (a systematic review and meta-analysis).

Behrad Ziapour, Elmira Mostafidi, Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani, Ali Kabir, Ikenna Okereke

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Behrad ZiapourTufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street #1035, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. behradzpr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-1455
Elmira MostafidiTabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Homayoun Sadeghi-BazarganiDepartment of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali KabirMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ikenna OkerekeChief of Thoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Program Director, Cardiothoracic Fellowship Program, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555-0528, USA.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this systematic review, we analyzed the optimal time range to evacuate traumatic-retained hemothorax using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine clinical trials database up to February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with relevant data were included. Data were extracted from studies that reported the success, mortality, or length of hospital stay (LOS) after using VATS during at least two out of three of our time-ranges of interest: days 1-3 (group A), days 4-6 (group B), and day 7 or later (group C).

resultsSix cohort studies with 476 total participants were included in the meta-analysis. The patients in group A had a significantly higher success rate than those in group C (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21-0.84, p = 0.01). The total LOS for patients whose retained hemothorax was evacuated in group A was 4.7 days shorter than that for those in group B (95% CI =  - 5.6 to  - 3.8, p = 0.006). Likewise, group B patients were discharged 18.1 days earlier than group C patients (95% CI =  - 22.3 to  - 14, p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was not decreased by early VATS.

conclusionsOur results indicate that VATS should be considered within the first three days of admission if this intervention is the clinician's choice to evacuate a traumatic-retained hemothorax. Protocol registration number in PROSPERO: CRD42017046856.

Indexed as

HemothoraxHumansLength of StayMortalityReoperationThoracic InjuriesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedThoracostomyTime FactorsTime-to-TreatmentHemothoraxRetained hemothoraxThoracic injuriesVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31848631
OpenAlexW2996532391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.