Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848435›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2019

Morphometric analysis of sella turcica in growing patients: an observational study on shape and dimensions in different sagittal craniofacial patterns.

Michele Tepedino, Michele Laurenziello, Laura Guida, Graziano Montaruli, Giuseppe Troiano, Claudio Chimenti, Marco Colonna, Domenico Ciavarella

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele TepedinoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. m.tepedino@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-9824
Michele LaurenzielloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Laura GuidaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Graziano MontaruliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe TroianoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Claudio ChimentiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Marco ColonnaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Domenico CiavarellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in sella dimensions and shape between growing patients with Class I, Class II, and Class III skeletal malocclusions, evaluated through morphometric analysis. Seventy-eight subjects aged between 9 and 13 years were selected and assigned to either the Class I, Class II, or Class III groups according to the measured ANB angle (the angle between the Nasion, skeletal A-point and skeletal B-point). Six landmarks were digitised to outline the shape of the sella turcica. Linear measurements of the sella length and depth were also performed. Procrustes superimposition, principal component analysis, and canonical variate analysis were used to evaluate the differences in sella shape between the three groups. A one-way MANOVA and Tukey's or Games-Howell tests were used to evaluate the presence of differences in sella dimensions between the three groups, gender, and age. The canonical variate analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in sella shape between the Class I and the Class II groups, mostly explained by the CV1 axis and related to the posterior clinoidal process and the floor of the sella. No differences were found regarding linear measurements, except between subjects with different age. These differences in sella shape, that are present in the earlier developmental stages, could be used as a predictor of facial growth, but further studies are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsBody Weights and MeasuresCephalometryChildFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IMalocclusion, Angle Class IIMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIPrincipal Component AnalysisSella Turcica

Identifiers

PMID31848435
PMCPMC6917804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.