Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848384›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Characterization of multi-channel intraneural stimulation in transradial amputees.

I Strauss, G Valle, F Artoni, E D'Anna, G Granata, R Di Iorio, D Guiraud, T Stieglitz, P M Rossini, S Raspopovic and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Electrical Stimulation of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) Induces Referred Sensations in People With Upper Limb Loss.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Flexible IrOActa biomaterialia · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

I StraussCenter for Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, and Bioelectronic Medicine and The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-8783
G ValleCenter for Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, and Bioelectronic Medicine and The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-8007
F ArtoniBertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0967-6643
E D'AnnaBertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
G GranataFondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
R Di IorioInstitute of Neurology, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Policlinic A. Gemelli Foundation, Roma, Italy.
D GuiraudUniversity of Montpellier, INRIA, CAMIN team, 860 Rue St Priest, 34090, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4184-6243
T StieglitzLaboratory for Biomedical Microtechnology, Department of Microsystems Engineering-IMTEK, Bernstein Center, BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, D-79110, Germany.
P M RossiniFondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
S RaspopovicLaboratory for Neuroengineering, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, ETH Zürich (ETH), Zürich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0567-9051
F M PetriniBertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. Francesco.petrini@sensars.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-9468
S MiceraCenter for Neuroscience, Neurotechnology, and Bioelectronic Medicine and The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. silvestro.micera@epfl.ch.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITInstitut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FRUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although peripheral nerve stimulation using intraneural electrodes has been shown to be an effective and reliable solution to restore sensory feedback after hand loss, there have been no reports on the characterization of multi-channel stimulation. A deeper understanding of how the simultaneous stimulation of multiple electrode channels affects the evoked sensations should help in improving the definition of encoding strategies for bidirectional prostheses. We characterized the sensations evoked by simultaneous stimulation of median and ulnar nerves (multi-channel configuration) in four transradial amputees who had been implanted with four TIMEs (Transverse Intrafascicular Multichannel Electrodes). The results were compared with the characterization of single-channel stimulation. The sensations were characterized in terms of location, extent, type, and intensity. Combining two or more single-channel configurations caused a linear combination of the sensation locations and types perceived with such single-channel stimulations. Interestingly, this was also true when two active sites from the same nerve were stimulated. When stimulating in multi-channel configuration, the charge needed from each electrode channel to evoke a sensation was significantly lower than the one needed in single-channel configuration (sensory facilitation). This result was also supported by electroencephalography (EEG) recordings during nerve stimulation. Somatosensory potentials evoked by multi-channel stimulation confirmed that sensations in the amputated hand were perceived by the subjects and that a perceptual sensory facilitation occurred. Our results should help the future development of more efficient bidirectional prostheses by providing guidelines for the development of more complex stimulation approaches to effectively restore multiple sensations at the same time.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsElectroencephalographyProsthesis DesignTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUlnar Nerve

Identifiers

PMID31848384
PMCPMC6917705
OpenAlexW2995112370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.