Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848361›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Biodegradation of Vulcanized SBR: A Comparison between Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptomyces sp.

Mostafa Galal Aboelkheir, Priscilla Braga Bedor, Selma Gomes Leite, Kaushik Pal, Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, Fernando Gomes de Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial plastic degradation: enzymes, pathways, challenges, and perspectives.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Chemically Recyclable and Biodegradable Vulcanized Rubber.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. 4R of rubber waste management: current and outlook.Journal of material cycles and waste management · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mostafa Galal AboelkheirLaboratório de Biopolímeros e Sensores - Instituto de Macromoléculas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-598, RJ, Brazil.
Priscilla Braga BedorEscola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, RJ, Brazil.
Selma Gomes LeiteEscola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, RJ, Brazil.
Kaushik PalDepartment of Nanotechnology, Bharath University, Tamil Nadu, 600073, India.
Romildo Dias Toledo FilhoPrograma de Engenharia Civil, COPPE, Centro de Tecnologia-Cidade Universitária, Av. Horacio Macedo, 2030, Bloco I. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Zip code 21941-450, Brazil.
Fernando Gomes de SouzaLaboratório de Biopolímeros e Sensores - Instituto de Macromoléculas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-598, RJ, Brazil. fernando_gomes@ima.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-4953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rubber residues present harmful impacts on health and environment, besides wasting valuable and huge amounts of rubber. Biological recycling technique is focused here to minimize this problem. A comparison of the biodegradation effect caused by Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptomyces sp., separately, on vulcanized SBR-rubber during 4 weeks is reported. The surface and molecular analyses were studied by FTIR-ATR, TGA, DSC, TC and SEM/EDS, in addition to the contact angle and crosslinking tests. B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and Streptomyces sp. evoked after 4 weeks a loss in v-SBR crosslinks by 17.15, 10.68 and 43.39% and also in the contact angle with water by 14.10, 12.86 and 15.71%, respectively., if compared to Control samples. FTIR findings indicate that the polymeric chain has been partially consumed causing C-C bonds scission indicating the biodegradation and bio-devulcanization phenomena. The bacterial strains caused a carbon loss by 9.15, 5.97 and 4.55% after one week and 16.09, 16.79 and 18.13% after four weeks for B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and Streptomyces sp. mediums, respectively. DSC and EDS results are also promising and highlighting Streptomyces sp. strain as the most effective biodegradative one as an alternative and natural mean of degrading vulcanized rubber residues.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBacillus subtilisHumansLatexPseudomonas aeruginosaRecyclingRubberStreptomycesLatexRubber

Identifiers

PMID31848361
PMCPMC6917721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.