Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Distinct mechanisms of signal processing by lamina I spino-parabrachial neurons.

K Agashkov, V Krotov, M Krasniakova, D Shevchuk, Y Andrianov, Y Zabenko, B V Safronov, N Voitenko, P Belan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Presynaptic Interactions between Trigeminal and Cervical Nociceptive Afferents Supplying Upper Cervical Lamina I Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons of the Spinal Cord Superficial Dorsal Horn Diverge in Their Somatosensory Responses and PlasticityThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

K AgashkovDepartment of Sensory Signaling, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
V KrotovDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
M KrasniakovaDepartment of Sensory Signaling, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
D ShevchukDepartment of Sensory Signaling, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
Y AndrianovDepartment of Sensory Signaling, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
Y ZabenkoDepartment of Sensory Signaling, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
B V SafronovInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. safronov@ibmc.up.pt.
N VoitenkoDepartment of Sensory Signaling, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine.
P BelanDepartment of Molecular Biophysics, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, 01024, Ukraine. pasha@biph.kiev.ua.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-3716
Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology · UAi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lamina I spino-parabrachial neurons (SPNs) receive peripheral nociceptive input, process it and transmit to the supraspinal centres. Although responses of SPNs to cutaneous receptive field stimulations have been intensively studied, the mechanisms of signal processing in these neurons are poorly understood. Therefore, we used an ex-vivo spinal cord preparation to examine synaptic and cellular mechanisms determining specific input-output characteristics of the neurons. The vast majority of the SPNs received a few direct nociceptive C-fiber inputs and generated one spike in response to saturating afferent stimulation, thus functioning as simple transducers of painful stimulus. However, 69% of afferent stimulation-induced action potentials in the entire SPN population originated from a small fraction (19%) of high-output neurons. These neurons received a larger number of direct Aδ- and C-fiber inputs, generated intrinsic bursts and efficiently integrated a local network activity via NMDA-receptor-dependent mechanisms. The high-output SPNs amplified and integrated the nociceptive input gradually encoding its intensity into the number of generated spikes. Thus, different mechanisms of signal processing allow lamina I SPNs to play distinct roles in nociception.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNeuronsNociceptionRatsRats, WistarSpinal CordSynapses

Identifiers

PMID31848358
PMCPMC6917718
OpenAlexW2996754398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.