Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848272›Full record

ArticlemBio2019

Characteristics of Wetting-Induced Bacteriophage Blooms in Biological Soil Crust.

Marc W Van Goethem, Tami L Swenson, Gareth Trubl, Simon Roux, Trent R Northen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Overcoming toxicity: How nonantagonistic microbes manage to thrive in boom-and-bust environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Soil viral diversity, ecology and climate change.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marc W Van GoethemEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Tami L SwensonEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Gareth TrublPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-1476
Simon RouxDOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-5895
Trent R NorthenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA TRNorthen@lbl.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-3259
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USJoint Genome Institute · USLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are photosynthetic "hot spots" in deserts and cover ∼12% of the Earth's terrestrial surface, and yet they face an uncertain future given expected shifts in rainfall events. Laboratory wetting of biocrust communities is known to cause a bloom of

Indexed as

BacteriophagesDesert ClimatePhotosynthesisSoil MicrobiologyBacillotaBacillusBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyEcosystemGene Expression ProfilingHost-Pathogen InteractionsMetagenomeMetagenomicsPhylogenyStructure-Activity RelationshipBacterial ProteinsbacteriophagesbiocrustFirmicutessoil microbiologyvirus-host interactionswetting

Identifiers

PMID31848272
PMCPMC6918073
OpenAlexW2995756593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.