Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848235›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

High-density chemical cross-linking for modeling protein interactions.

Julian Mintseris, Steven P Gygi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mapping the interaction surface between CaNature communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julian MintserisDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 julian_mintseris@hms.harvard.edu steven_gygi@hms.harvard.edu.
Steven P GygiDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 julian_mintseris@hms.harvard.edu steven_gygi@hms.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · US

Funding

New Sample Multiplexing Technologies to Identify Chemical Probes and Illuminate Ubiquitin BiologyR01GM067945 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI GYGI, STEVEN P · 2003 to 2024
$10.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed mechanistic understanding of protein complex function is greatly enhanced by insights from its 3-dimensional structure. Traditional methods of protein structure elucidation remain expensive and labor-intensive and require highly purified starting material. Chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry offers an alternative that has seen increased use, especially in combination with other experimental approaches like cryo-electron microscopy. Here we report advances in method development, combining several orthogonal cross-linking chemistries as well as improvements in search algorithms, statistical analysis, and computational cost to achieve coverage of 1 unique cross-linked position pair for every 7 amino acids at a 1% false discovery rate. This is accomplished without any peptide-level fractionation or enrichment. We apply our methods to model the complex between a carbonic anhydrase (CA) and its protein inhibitor, showing that the cross-links are self-consistent and define the interaction interface at high resolution. The resulting model suggests a scaffold for development of a class of protein-based inhibitors of the CA family of enzymes. We next cross-link the yeast proteasome, identifying 3,893 unique cross-linked peptides in 3 mass spectrometry runs. The dataset includes 1,704 unique cross-linked position pairs for the proteasome subunits, more than half of them intersubunit. Using multiple recently solved cryo-EM structures, we show that observed cross-links reflect the conformational dynamics and disorder of some proteasome subunits. We further demonstrate that this level of cross-linking density is sufficient to model the architecture of the 19-subunit regulatory particle de novo.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingCross-Linking ReagentsCryoelectron MicroscopyImaging, Three-DimensionalMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein ConformationProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCross-Linking ReagentsPeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteinscross-linkingintegrative modelingmass spectrometryprotein docking

Identifiers

PMID31848235
PMCPMC6955236
OpenAlexW2995001578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.