Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848201›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care.

Ola Markiewicz, Mary Lavelle, Fabiana Lorencatto, Gaby Judah, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient- and family-centred care transition interventions for adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Reducing risks in complex care transitions in rural areas: a grounded theory.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ola MarkiewiczNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.
Mary LavelleNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.
Fabiana LorencattoUniversity College London (UCL) Centre for Behaviour Change, UCL, London.
Gaby JudahNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.
Hutan AshrafianNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.
Ara DarziNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransitions between healthcare settings are vulnerable points for patients.

aimTo identify key threats to safe patient transitions from hospital to primary care settings. DESIGN AND

settingThree-round web-based Delphi consensus process among clinical and non-clinical staff from 39 primary care practices in North West London, England.

methodRound 1 was a free-text idea-generating round. Rounds 2 and 3 were consensus-obtaining rating rounds. Practices were encouraged to complete the questionnaires at team meetings. Aggregate ratings of perceived level of importance for each threat were calculated (1-3:

resultsA total of 39 practices completed round 1, 36/39 (92%) completed round 2, and 30/36 (83%) completed round 3. Round 1 identified nine threats encompassing problems involving communication, service organisation, medication provision, and patients who were most at risk. 'Poor quality of handover instructions from secondary to primary care teams' achieved the highest rating (mean rating at round 3 = 8.43) and a 100% consensus that it was a

conclusionThis study identified specific threats to safe patient transitions from hospital to primary care, providing policymakers and healthcare providers with targets for quality improvement strategies. Further work would need to identify factors underpinning these threats so that interventions can be tailored to the relevant behavioural and environmental contexts in which these threats arise.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelChildChild Health ServicesDelphi TechniqueFemaleFrail ElderlyHealth PersonnelHealth Services for the AgedHumansLondonMalePatient DischargePatient HandoffPatient Safetycommunicationpatient dischargepatient handovertransition of care

Identifiers

PMID31848201
PMCPMC6917362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.