Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31848197›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Predictors of emergency department and GP use among patients with mental health conditions: a public health survey.

Pooja Saini, Jason McIntyre, Rhiannon Corcoran, Konstantinos Daras, Clarissa Giebel, Elizabeth Fuller, Jane Shelton, Timothy Wilson, Terence Comerford, Rajan Nathan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pooja SainiSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool.
Jason McIntyreSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool.
Rhiannon CorcoranInstitute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Konstantinos DarasInstitute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool; NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool.
Clarissa GiebelInstitute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool; NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool.
Elizabeth FullerNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool.
Jane SheltonNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool.
Timothy WilsonNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool.
Terence ComerfordNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool.
Rajan NathanCheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool.
Mark GabbayInstitute of Public Health Sciences, University of Liverpool; NIHR ARC NW, Liverpool.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh demand for health services is an issue of current importance in England, in part because of the rapidly increasing use of emergency departments (EDs) and GP practices for mental health conditions and the high cost of these services.

aimTo examine the social determinants of health service use in people with mental health issues. DESIGN AND

settingTwenty-eight neighbourhoods, each with a population of 5000-10 000 people, in the north west coast of England with differing levels of deprivation.

methodA comprehensive public health survey was conducted, comprising questions on housing, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social issues, environment, work, and finances. Poisson regression models assessed the effect of mental health comorbidity, mental and physical health comorbidity, and individual mental health symptoms on ED and general practice attendances, adjusting for relevant socioeconomic and lifestyle factors.

resultsParticipants who had both a physical and mental health condition reported attending the ED (rate ratio [RR] = 4.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.86 to 7.51) and general practice (RR = 3.82, 95% CI = 3.16 to 4.62) more frequently than all other groups. Having a higher number of mental health condition symptoms was associated with higher general practice and ED service use. Depression was the only mental health condition symptom that was significantly associated with ED attendance (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.90), and anxiety was the only symptom significantly associated with GP attendance (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.38).

conclusionMental health comorbidities increase the risk of attendances to both EDs and general practice. Further research into the social attributes that contribute to reduced ED and general practice attendance rates is needed.

Indexed as

Public HealthAdultEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth Services ResearchHealth SurveysHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial Determinants of HealthSocioeconomic Factorsemergency departmentsmental healthprimary careservice usesocial care

Identifiers

PMID31848197
PMCPMC6917360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.