ArticleBMJ open2019
Trends in antiepileptic drug treatment and effectiveness in clinical practice in England from 2003 to 2016: a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The second unprovoked seizure in a cohort of treated patients with a first unprovoked seizure.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Understanding Remission of Long-Term Conditions Through Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Network analysis of antiseizure medication use, efficacy, and safety in epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care center.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- Resting motor threshold in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation: relationship between inter-individual variance and distinct clinical and anatomical factors.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Prescription Patterns of Antiseizure Medication in Adult Patients with Epilepsy in Kazakhstan (2021-2023).Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Trends in prescription of new antiseizure medications in a single center in Latin America: evidence of clinical practice.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- Practices in the prescription of antiseizure medications: is it time to change?Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2024Article
- Anti-seizure medication prescription preferences: a Moroccan multicenter study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Shift from older- to newer-generation antiseizure medications in people with acute ischemic stroke in Australia: A population-based study.Epilepsia open · 2023Article
- Liver enzyme inducing anticonvulsant drug use is associated with prevalent vertebral fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023Article
- Severity of Epilepsy and Response to Antiseizure Medications in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of a Real-World Dataset.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2022Article
- Article
- Trends in Prescribing of Antiseizure Medications in South Korea: Real-World Evidence for Treated Patients With Epilepsy.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022Article
- Systemic medicines taken by adult special care dental patients and implications for the management of their care.British dental journal · 2021Review
- Anti-seizure Medication Prescription in Adult Outpatients With Epilepsy in China, 2013-2018.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the evolution of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment patterns and seizure outcomes in England from 2003 to 2016. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsRetrospective cohort study of electronic medical records from Clinical Practice Research Datalink and National Health Service Digital Hospital Episode Statistics databases. Patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy were identified and followed until end of data availability. Three eras were defined starting 1 April 2003 (first National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline); 1 September 2007 (Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs publication); and 1 January 2012 (second NICE guideline). OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from diagnosis to first AED; AED sequence; time from first AED to first 1-year remission period (no new AED attempts and no seizure-related healthcare events); time from first AED to refractoriness (third AED attempt regardless of reason); Kaplan-Meier analysis of time-to-event variables.
results4388 patients were included (mean follow-up: 6.8, 4.2 and 1.7 years by era). 84.6% of adults (≥16 years), 75.5% of children (<16) and 89.1% of elderly subgroup (65+) received treatment within 1 year; rates were generally stable over time. Treatment trends included reduced use of carbamazepine (adult first line, era 1: 34.9%; era 3: 10.7%) and phenytoin, earlier line and increased use of levetiracetam (adult first line, era 1: 2.6%; era 3: 26.2%) and lamotrigine (particularly in adults and elderly subgroup), and a larger number of different AEDs used. Valproate use shifted somewhat to later lines. Rates of 1-year remission within 2 years of starting treatment increased in adults (era 1: 71.9%; era 3: 81.4%) and elderly (era 1: 76.1%; era 3: 81.7%). Overall, 55.5% of patients relapsed after achieving 1-year remission. Refractoriness rates remained stable over time (~26% of adults within 5 years).
conclusionTreatment trends often were not aligned with era-relevant guidance. However, our results suggest a slight improvement in epilepsy treatment outcomes over the 13-year period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.