Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847913›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Community interventions to prevent violence against women and girls in informal settlements in Mumbai: the SNEHA-TARA pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Nayreen Daruwalla, Unnati Machchhar, Shanti Pantvaidya, Vanessa D'Souza, Lu Gram, Andrew Copas, David Osrin

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nayreen DaruwallaSNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), 310, 3rd floor, Urban Health Centre, 60 Feet Road, Dharavi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400017, India.
Unnati MachchharSNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), 310, 3rd floor, Urban Health Centre, 60 Feet Road, Dharavi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400017, India.
Shanti PantvaidyaSNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), 310, 3rd floor, Urban Health Centre, 60 Feet Road, Dharavi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400017, India.
Vanessa D'SouzaSNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), 310, 3rd floor, Urban Health Centre, 60 Feet Road, Dharavi, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400017, India.
Lu GramUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Andrew CopasInstitute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, 90 High Holborn, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
David OsrinUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. d.osrin@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-9684
Society for Nutrition Education and Health Action · INInstitute of Child Health · GRMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206417/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a cluster randomised controlled trial in Mumbai slums, we will test the effects on the prevalence of violence against women and girls of community mobilisation through groups and individual volunteers. One in three women in India has survived physical or sexual violence, making it a major public health burden. Reviews recommend community mobilisation to address violence, but trial evidence is limited.

methodsGuided by a theory of change, we will compare 24 areas receiving support services, community group, and volunteer activities with 24 areas receiving support services only. These community mobilisation activities will be evaluated through a follow-up survey after 3 years. Primary outcomes will be prevalence in the preceding year of physical or sexual domestic violence, and prevalence of emotional or economic domestic violence, control, or neglect against women 15-49 years old. Secondary outcomes will describe disclosure of violence to support services, community tolerance of violence against women and girls, prevalence of non-partner sexual violence, and mental health and wellbeing. Intermediate theory-based outcomes will include bystander intervention, identification of and support for survivors of violence, changes described in programme participants, and changes in communities. DISCUSSION: Systematic reviews of interventions to prevent violence against women and girls suggest that community mobilisation is a promising population-based intervention. Already implemented in other areas, our intervention has been developed over 16 years of programmatic experience and 2 years of formative research. Backed by public engagement and advocacy, our vision is of a replicable community-led intervention to address the public health burden of violence against women and girls.

trial registrationControlled Trials Registry of India, CTRI/2018/02/012047. Registered on 21 February 2018. ISRCTN, ISRCTN84502355. Registered on 22 February 2018.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCommunity Health ServicesCommunity ParticipationDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansIndiaIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMiddle AgedPoverty AreasPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSex OffensesSurveys and QuestionnairesDomestic violenceGender-based violenceIndiaIntimate partner violenceMumbaiRandomised controlled trialTrial protocol

Identifiers

PMID31847913
PMCPMC6918681
OpenAlexW2995093697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.